Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:08:22PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> The scipy-core in stable is very old and
>>> doesn't support python26. Can we get this
>>> stale 1.1.0-1 package updated to the 1.3.0-3
>>> package from unstable?
>>>
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
>> Charles Lepple wrote:
>>> On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
>>>
I got a report from a user that pcb doesn't build on 10.6, and
while
trying to patch out the problem, it seems like bison isn't
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:46:31AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:08:22PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> >
> >> Jack Howarth wrote:
> >>
> >>> The scipy-core in stable is very old and
> >>> doesn't support python26. Can we get this
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> The maintainer should be informed when something is done to one of their
>> packages, regardless, as a courtesy, even if it is after the fact.
>
> Alexander,
> I would add the resync'ing to stable is somewhat of a special case.
> We aren't rea
Should the wiki and/or blog page be listed here (perhaps under other
pages)?
http://www.finkproject.org/help/index.php
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Wyatt wrote:
> Should the wiki and/or blog page be listed here (perhaps under other
> pages)?
> http://www.finkproject.org/help/index.php
>
Sure.
The wiki's already listed on the top page, but it doesn't cost any extra
money for a new link. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/09 9:05 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I would add the resync'ing to stable is somewhat of a special case.
> We aren't really changing the maintainers packaging but rather attempting
> to move his latest packaging over from unstable. Unless we
I'll look into it, haven't had a chance to look at bash yet.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Robert Wyatt wrote:
> []
>>
>> gcc -L./builtins -L./lib/readline -L./lib/readline -L./lib/glob
>> -L./lib/tilde -L./lib/sh -L/sw/lib -g -O2 -o bash shell.o eval.o y.tab.o
>>
Hi All,
Starting the end of next week, I'm going to be on a ship with limited internet
access through the end of Oct. If there are critical updates to any of my
packages during that time, please go ahead and make the changes. Just please
send me an email if you do make changes.
Thanks!
-ku
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:09:31AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/10/09 9:05 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > I would add the resync'ing to stable is somewhat of a special case.
> > We aren't really changing the maintainers packaging but ra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/09 11:38 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Benjamin,
>What about the case where the maintainer himself has already
> checked in packaging for x86_64 and 10.6 into unstable. Consider...
> http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.4/unst
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:46:38AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/10/09 11:38 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Benjamin,
> >What about the case where the maintainer himself has already
> > checked in packaging for x86_64 and 10.6 into unsta
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:02:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:46:38AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> > On 9/10/09 11:38 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >
> > > Benjamin,
> > >What about the case where the maintainer himself has already
> > > checked in packaging for x86_6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/09 12:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Benjamin,
>Your concept of personal space also assumes that we have adequate
> manpower to maintain fink in a usable state. I would remind you that if I
> hadn't pushed through some of the changes I made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is appropriate for some discussion on -devel. Sorry about having
two not-quite-related items here.
Issue 1
I'd propose the following new item:
"If you have X11 2.4.0 from macosxforge.org, and have built packages
against that, we
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is obvious that the
X11 Xquartz situation is going to be very problematic
for fink in the absence of manpower to maintain a proper
set of X11 packages in fink. It has also become clear
secti
Dear Jack,
We are grateful for your many contributions to fink, and sorry to see
you go. Best wishes for the future.
Yours,
Dave
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Daniel and Benjamin,
> I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
> MacPorts for awhile now sin
Dear Fink community:
I want to apologize, because I think this is really mostly my fault.
I made a faulty assumption about ownership of the scipy package
without looking, and suggested he (Jack) added it to stable because he
was spending a few hours trying to work out a bug that was prevent
Hi William!
Actually, I do not thing you have to apologize for anything. You did
not do anything wrong. And it was not your actions that caused a stir,
after all. It was Jack's decision to do what he did, not yours.
Cheers,
Max
Am 10.09.2009 um 23:39 schrieb William G. Scott:
> Dear Fink co
Hi Jack, all
Jack, good luck for you, and I hope for both you and the MacPorts
folks that you'll get along better with them.
Cheers,
Max
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> Hi Jack, all
>
> Jack, good luck for you, and I hope for both you and the MacPorts
> folks that you'll get along better with them.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
Max,
Nice back biting slap on the way out. You just can't help
yourself can you?
Jack
ps Other than yourself, Benjamin Reed and Daniel
Just to clear the air here, for those
here are that unaware my transgressions
being bandied about, here they are...
1) I created a sdl-x86_64.info variant
in an attempt to free up the build of
gnuplot on x86_64 fink. After removing
this change, I found that we could simply
avoid Max Horn's pack
I should also add how utterly amusing I find it that
some of the same people who endlessly carped at me during
the maturation of x86_64 fink (that I was pushing the
development to hard) now claim it was a mistake to
try to do i386 fink on 10.6 instead of just x86_64.
Jack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/09 7:14 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Just to clear the air here, for those
> here are that unaware my transgressions
> being bandied about, here they are...
I won't deign to speak for others, but I believe Max was sincere in his
well wishes, a
Am 11.09.2009 um 00:56 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>> Hi Jack, all
>>
>> Jack, good luck for you, and I hope for both you and the MacPorts
>> folks that you'll get along better with them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Max
>
> Max,
> Nice back biting slap on the way out. You just can't help
> yourself can you?
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
