Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:47:20AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] There was an official update of 10.4's X11 via Software Update. And on Leopard a number of the system updates included files in the X11 distribution. I agree with Jack on the fact that the xquartz

[Fink-devel] config.guess changed committed upstream

2009-09-18 Thread Jack Howarth
FYI, the config.guess change for darwin10 is now committed to git HEAD... http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=blob_plain;f=config.guess;hb=HEAD anyone who is having build issues in their projects should alert their upstream to the availability of the new config.guess and have

[Fink-devel] Samba-StartupItem.tar.gz

2009-09-18 Thread Robert Wyatt
In trying to install snort, I find a problem in finding the file Samba-StartupItem.tar.gz which seems to be needed for Samba. It doesn't seem to be on any of the mirrors. I haven't had a chance yet to figure out where it might be hiding. --Robert

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread David R. Morrison
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin, I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11 in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer at Apple as well as the

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin, I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11 in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr: David R. Morrison wrote: On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin,    I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11 in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt if present (remember

[Fink-devel] saw this coming...

2009-09-18 Thread Jack Howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41260#c31 Bummer. This is the first omen that Intel darwin as a primary FSF gcc target is not long for this earth. Sigh. Jack -- Come build with us! The

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread David R. Morrison
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr: David R. Morrison wrote: On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin, I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11 in Snow Leopard is already

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/9/18 David R. Morrison d...@finkproject.org: On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr: David R. Morrison wrote: On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin,   I don't follow your last statement. My understanding

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Martin Costabel
Michal Suchanek wrote: 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr: [] completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11. Well, perhaps you can introduce a variable which specifies the X location so most packages can be

Re: [Fink-devel] XQuartz alpha1 for 10.6

2009-09-18 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 05:58:00PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Michal Suchanek wrote: 2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr: [] completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11. Well, perhaps you can introduce a

Re: [Fink-devel] saw this coming...

2009-09-18 Thread Jack Howarth
FYI, this issue looks fixable (knock on wood)... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025908.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025909.html The breakage in gcc trunk is due to the additional epilog unwind information which darwin's unwinder