Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 05.07.2010 um 23:20 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > I'd say to Peter to verify what's going on via "nm > /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib | grep dither" Nothing in lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 17. Jun 14:10 /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib -> libpng14.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 17. Jun 14:10 /usr/X11/li

[Fink-devel] Naive question on versioning and distribution

2010-07-05 Thread Scott Hannahs
I did the original package development for a package and now have heard that the installation fails on 10.6. I haven't looked at package development in awhile and there are a lot of improvements so I was going to update the package. My package is *not* a perl module but a utility that uses seve

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread David R. Morrison
Anyway, the new revision xfig-3.2.5-1013 should fix this for you. -- Dave On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:31 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >> OK. That explains the issue: The Xquartz release candidate that you're >> using libpng14 rather than

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > OK. That explains the issue: The Xquartz release candidate that you're > using libpng14 rather than libpng12, and xfig isn't building against > fink's libpng3 as it should. As you pointed out, xfig is actually linking to libpng from X11 r

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'd say to Peter to verify what's going on via "nm /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib | grep dither" It's possible that Peter's libpng in X11 got downgraded by a system update--the perils of using Xquartz--or that it's just not a new enough Xquartz (as the ver

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/5/10 6:02 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 05.07.2010 um 23:20 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > >> I'd say to Peter to verify what's going on via "nm >> /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib | grep dither" > > Nothing in > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 17. Jun 1

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I get the same "checking for inflate in -lz... yes" message. - From my config.log: configure:12607: checking for inflate in -lz configure:12632: gcc -o conftest -Os -I/sw/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib - -lX11 -L/sw/lib conftest.c -lz >&5 configure:12632

[Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

2010-07-05 Thread David R. Morrison
Anybody have any ideas about this one? The "missing" symbol appears to be present in /sw/lib/libpng.dylib (the one installed by fink's libpng3 package). Begin forwarded message: > From: Peter Dyballa > Date: July 5, 2010 1:33:10 PM MDT > To: d...@finkproject.org > Subject: Failure building xfi

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Daniel E. Macks
During ./configure I and Bastiaan both see: checking for inflate in -lz... yes which is from configure.ac: # test for zlib zlib=0 AC_CHECK_LIB(z, inflate,zlib=1,zlib=0) AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_ZLIB, test x$zlib = x1) if test "x$zlib" != "x1" then AC_MSG_ERROR([GMPC plugin requires z

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Reproduced on 10.4/ppc. The unresolved symbols appear to be used within gmpc itself so it's not an inherted problem (under-linking in dependent lib). dan Bastiaan Jacques said: > The build output is available here: > >http://bjacques.org/gmpc.buildlog > > FWIW, I'm using 10.6 unstable. > > B

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Bastiaan Jacques
The build output is available here: http://bjacques.org/gmpc.buildlog FWIW, I'm using 10.6 unstable. Bastiaan On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Alexander Hansen wrote: > It's really hard to say what should be done without seeing the relevant > build output rather than just a verbal description. I was un

Re: [Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/5/10 8:46 AM, Bastiaan Jacques wrote: > Hi, > > Fink fails to link gmpc; the linker complains of missing libz symbols > such as _inflateEnd. I solved the problem locally by adding -lz to > SetLDFLAGS, but I don't know whether this should be fixed

[Fink-devel] gnome/gmpc-0.20.0-2 linker failure (needs libz)

2010-07-05 Thread Bastiaan Jacques
Hi, Fink fails to link gmpc; the linker complains of missing libz symbols such as _inflateEnd. I solved the problem locally by adding -lz to SetLDFLAGS, but I don't know whether this should be fixed upstream. Cheers, Bastiaan -