Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-13 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:50:30 -0400, Daniel Johnson wrote: > On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 4/5/11 8:34 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> > >> And so on. I would like to propose that all obsolete packages receive a common, uniform description, namely: > >> > >> "OBS

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-13 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 4/5/11 8:34 AM, Max Horn wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> we have a bunch of "obsolete" packages, which typically only still exist to >> smoothly and automatically transit users to their successor packages. >> Typically, such packages depend o

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/5/11 8:34 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Hi there, > > we have a bunch of "obsolete" packages, which typically only still exist to > smoothly and automatically transit users to their successor packages. > Typically, such packages depend on fink-obsolete

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread David R. Morrison
The problem with this approach is that it short-circuits one of Fink's security features (the checking of MD5sum for source files) and it also short-circuits Fink's storage of source files in its own archive to guard against the day when the source file is no longer available from the original d

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/13/11 2:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:33:46AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: >> The problem with this approach is that it short-circuits one of Fink's >> security features (the checking of MD5sum for source files) and i

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:44:29PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On 04/13/2011 01:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> svn co -r129359http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ > > Jack, > > I have done: > > $ svn export -r129359 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ > dragonegg-r129

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:33:46AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: > The problem with this approach is that it short-circuits one of Fink's > security features (the checking of MD5sum for source files) and it also > short-circuits Fink's storage of source files in its own archive to guard > agai

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 04/13/2011 01:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > svn co -r129359http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ Jack, I have done: $ svn export -r129359 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ dragonegg-r129359 $ tar cjf dragonegg-r129359.tar.bz2 dragonegg-r129359 and put it at http:/

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Hanspeter, The dragonegg-gcc.info posted at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3281454&group_id=17203&atid=414256 works well enough so far. I used... Source: none with the svn download in the PatchScript... PatchScript: << #!/bin/bash -ev svn co -r129359 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-13 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 4/12/11 11:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >Do we have any approved examples of packages which pull their sources > dynamically from an svn repository? The newest dragonegg svn is quite > good against the release llvm 2.9 (building all of xplor-nih with > the three compilers, gcc, g++ and gfortra