Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-14 Thread Max Horn
Am 14.04.2011 um 03:30 schrieb Daniel Macks: [...] Would be easy to make validator relax its Description test for obsolete packages (there are already other special allowances for them that are fatal otherwise). That would be good then. Though actually, I wonder if we should relax the

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: [] Though I still agree that sometimes it's a bit tough to avoid the package name... OK, I can't think of a concrete example right now, but imagine you had a tool called image for image processing... using the description process alone seems a bit too minimalistic. So in the

Re: [Fink-devel] using svn to pull source

2011-04-14 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:44:29PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On 04/13/2011 01:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: svn co -r129359http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ Jack, I have done: $ svn export -r129359 http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk/ dragonegg-r129359 $