Re: [Fink-devel] Handling flat_namespace on 10.10+

2015-04-21 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On Thu, April 16, 2015 11:46 am, Alexander Hansen wrote: Summary: GNU libtool effectively assumed that there would be no 10.10, so a bunch of packages inherited conditional logic that treats 10.10 like 10.1. We’ve been patching against this, and put a .deb validator check for

Re: [Fink-devel] Handling flat_namespace on 10.10+

2015-04-21 Thread Jack Howarth
What about a fink flag that would allow certain stages of validation to be skipped. Something like --disable-validation= where it could be passed the major stages like deb, etc. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: On Thu, April 16, 2015 11:46

Re: [Fink-devel] Handling flat_namespace on 10.10+

2015-04-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Apr 21, 2015, at 12:24, Jack Howarth howarth.at.f...@gmail.com wrote: What about a fink flag that would allow certain stages of validation to be skipped. Something like --disable-validation= where it could be passed the major stages like deb, etc. That functionality already exists,

Re: [Fink-devel] Handling flat_namespace on 10.10+

2015-04-21 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:14:10 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: On Thu, April 16, 2015 11:46 am, Alexander Hansen wrote: Summary: GNU libtool effectively assumed that there would be no 10.10, so a bunch of packages inherited conditional logic that treats 10.10