Hey,
Both postfix-release and gdal need updating, and I haven't had time
recently to do what needs to be done. Having an unstable computer
doesn't help things.
Anyway, if anyone would like to take over those packages, I would
appreciate it.
There are newer postfix packages than those in CVS i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 03:09 AM, Tony Lacey wrote:
[ . . . ] However dpkg reports that this package
(system-xfree86_4.2-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) fails the preinstall
scripts. [ . . . ]
Did you remember to install the SDK? That is the erro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 01:34 AM, Daniel Parks wrote:
system-xfree86-4.2-3 fails to install for me. I'll get to the error in
a minute.
*Ahem* It helps to install the SDK.
Somebody should do some sort of announcement about this, o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
system-xfree86-4.2-3 fails to install for me. I'll get to the error in
a minute.
I just installed X11 after force removing xfree86-base-threaded,
xfree86-base-threaded-shlibs, xfree86-rootless-threaded, and
xfree86-rootless-threaded-shlib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hay all,
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 08:42 AM, Max Horn wrote:
/usr/local/fink falls into about the same category as /usr/local. In
fact, I think it combines that bad parts of /usr/local with any
drawbacks /sw has... :-)
I agree. Anyway, as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
There seems to be an mistake in either Fink or the documentation about
InstallScript, Files, and SplitOff.
According to the documentation, Files is supposed to run after the
InstallScript of the parent package, but before the InstallScript of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 05:38 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Daniel Parks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I want to make the postfix package track releases and deprecate
postfix-release. There are a couple of problems with this,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
I want to make the postfix package track releases and deprecate
postfix-release. There are a couple of problems with this, which I've
already mailed the list about ("Upgrading postfix"):
1) postfix uses MMDD versioning schemes, but the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just noticed a bug in the bug tracker that applies to postfix;
normally I wouldn't have noticed.
How am I supposed to find out about bugs in the tracker? It seems like
quite a lot more effort than it's worth to have to manually check it. I
c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 12:48 AM, Daniel Parks wrote:
I am creating two new packages (actually, Steven M. Bytnar created the
packages and I'm upgrading them), postfix-sasl and postfix-sasl-tls.
I'm also considering adding MyS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
I have a little problem with the package I maintain, Postfix.
I am creating two new packages (actually, Steven M. Bytnar created the
packages and I'm upgrading them), postfix-sasl and postfix-sasl-tls.
The problem is that I current
Hey all,
I was alerted that postfix-20011226-2.info in unstable has some
"interesting" BuildDepends:
BuildDepends: db3 (>= 3.3.11-4), libxml2, gdbm, gmp, expat, tcltk-dev
Why are libxml2, gmp, expat, tcltk-dev BuildDepends for Postfix?
I haven't been reading email for a few months, so I probab
Hey all,
It seems like the users in passwd should have mail aliases to root --
otherwise mail to, say, postfix will end up in a postfix mail spool that
no one ever checks.
Right now, I have the postfix.package creating an alias from postfix to
root (I'm removing it from the next postfix package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 03:50 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> The way I was thinking everything should work is to have to extensions,
> .info and .xinfo. Then Fink could look for both, and if it is .info, use
> the old format, and if it is .xi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 01:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 03:38, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>> * Move to a new package format - yes or no, and which. This has to be
>>> carefully designed, I think.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 09:28 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 7:49 Uhr -0500 20.01.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> I was looking through the fink perlmods, and I came across another
>> function: read_properties_multival. Can someone (Max? Finlay?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Postfix 1.1 was just released, and I want to update the postfix package,
but it is currently at 20011226. I haven't tested this, but I have a
feeling that Fink thinks 20011226 > 1.1.
Postfix snapshots are still being released using something simila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, so it's proof of concept. That clears things up for me.
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 02:22 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 1:30 Uhr -0800 19.01.2002, Daniel Parks wrote:
[ . . . ]
>> On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Kyle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 11:48 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> 2) Allow "options" that can be combined at will:
> * the base settings, no options
> * "ssl" - will enable ssl support
> * "nox" - will build without X11
> * "nognome" - will build wiht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
Why name="foo", etc, but no maintainer="John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"?
> bar, x11
That comma syntax seems a bit un-XML.
>
Ugh. Time to learn XML "for real."
>
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 11:37 AM, El JoPe Magnifico wrote:
> (*) As a perl devotee, I understand your revulsion to forced use of
> indentation, Randall. I'm of the same mind... but only with respect
> to soruce code. This is not source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 11:33 PM, Daniel Parks wrote:
> Maybe someone can be ME with the clue stick, but I think that is a
> spelling mistake. I've never heard of a .al file. Maybe they want
> libeconduit.la?
Sorry, I di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 08:15 PM, Mike Barnes wrote:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link cc
> -L/sw/src/evolution-1.0-1/evolution-1.0/src/.libs -Wall -Wunused
> -L/sw/lib -o libeconduit.la
> rm -fr .libs/libeconduit.la .libs/libeconduit.* .libs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, that pretty much sums it up. I'm thinking /var/mail for
compatibility.
If I already have mail in /var/spool/mail, and I switch to a new MTA
via Fink, and the new MTA delivers to /sw/var/spool/mail, then all
of my mail is going to disappear.
24 matches
Mail list logo
