[Fink-devel] [ fink-Package Submissions-3534202 ] Ghostscript 9.05-1

Hello! 9½ days ago I sent Hisashi Todd Fujinaka an email asking him whether we could combine efforts. I did not receive any answer. Could it be reopened? -- Greetings Pete The world would be a better place if Larry Wall had been born in Iceland, or any other country where the native languag

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] "Error: The -framework flag may get munged by libtool." when building with gcc46

Am 02.06.2012 um 16:00 schrieb Alexander Hansen: >> Validating .deb dir /sw/build.build/root-imagemagick-6.7.7-2-1... >> Error: The -framework flag may get munged by libtool. See the gcc >> manpage for information about passing multi-word options to flags for >> specific compiler pass

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] "Error: The -framework flag may get munged by libtool." when building with gcc46

Am 02.06.2012 um 23:22 schrieb Alexander Hansen: >>> 1) They're not BuildDependsOnly packages, but normally the only >>> packages >>> that Depend on them do so to run their compilers. >> >> That's what I am thinking off... > > But why? That's only relevant if _every_ package that builds agains

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] "Error: The -framework flag may get munged by libtool." when building with gcc46

Am 02.06.2012 um 16:00 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > Why are you doing Depends: gcc44 | gcc45 | gcc46 | gcc47 ? Because it has to be at least GCC 4.4 to build a non-crashing ImageMagick with OpenMP support and I don't want to dictate a particular version. > > 1) They're not BuildDependsOnly pac

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Metacity on 10.7 builds but does not build

Am 31.3.2012 um 02:52 schrieb Stefan Bruda: > I am sure I am missing something, but what would be the difference > between the fink environment and the shell? Advice is appreciated. This can be checked quite easily: copy the INFO (and possible PATCH) file of a package into your local "reposito

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

Am 06.07.2010 um 00:45 schrieb David R. Morrison: > Anyway, the new revision xfig-3.2.5-1013 should fix this for you. Yes, building it went fine, uses Fink's libpng12.0, and works! -- Greetings Pete Either this man is dead or my watch has stopped. - Groucho

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Failure building xfig-3.2.5-1012

Am 05.07.2010 um 23:20 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > I'd say to Peter to verify what's going on via "nm > /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib | grep dither" Nothing in lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 17. Jun 14:10 /usr/X11/lib/libpng.dylib -> libpng14.dylib lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 17. Jun 14:10 /usr/X11/li

[Fink-devel] fop-1:0.20.5-12

Feedback: not good Hello! Two days ago I built 2010-02-04 10:48 18481472 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin- powerpc/text/fop_0.95-1_darwin-powerpc.deb and now, after a self-update, Fink wants to "update" it with FOP 0.20 – mathematically correct this cannot be called an update. --

[Fink-devel] lesstif-1:0.95.2-1

Hello! Is there a good reason why lesstif uses a stone-old libfontconfig? lesstif-0.95.2/compile [ -r /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/lesstif.patch ] ... ./configure --prefix=/sw --disable-build-12 --disable-build-20 -- enable-build-21 --enable-static --

[Fink-devel] vtwm-5.4.6b-3

Hello! This package installs the man page directly in /sw/share/man. -- Package manager version: 0.29.7 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Jun 11 11:40:04 2009, 10.4, powerpc Mac OS X version: 10.4.11 Xcode version: 2.5 gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370) make version:

[Fink-devel] openssl098-shlibs-0.9.8k-1

Hello Building this package fails at the end: readlink -f $f tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'<<<"$f" tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'<<<"$g" ## There remain symlinks BN_print.3 -> BN_bn2bin.3 and bn_print.3 - > bn_internal.3, we rename the latter. rm -f /sw/src/fin

Re: [Fink-devel] blt-2.4z-15l

Am 02.09.2008 um 21:17 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > Are you saying that you made such a local modification to the package? Yes. Since TclTk is not that important for me I can live without the newest version. So I am using a local variant of the original package. > If so, why didn't you mention

Re: [Fink-devel] blt-2.4z-15l

Am 02.09.2008 um 21:44 schrieb Martin Costabel: > One of the side effects of your hackery must have been to place - > ljpeg on that linker line for bltsh. In the original it is not > there, it is only on the linker line for bltwish. In my version the configure option --enable-jpeg was added c

Re: [Fink-devel] blt-2.4z-15l

Am 02.09.2008 um 19:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > Also: you didn't quote the whole compiler command. It's not available in the moment – the *compilation* buffer is used for other work. There is one difference: I am using Apple's TclTk. So its -L/sw/lib switch gets lost somewhere, which di

Re: [Fink-devel] blt-2.4z-15l

Am 02.09.2008 um 18:50 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > blt shows an explicit build dependency on libjpeg, so the missing > library _should_ be available. What do you get from > > ls -l /sw/lib/libjpeg*.dylib ? -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 144188 8 Dez 2006 /sw/lib/libjpeg. 62.0.0.dylib lrwxr-xr

[Fink-devel] blt-2.4z-15l

Hello! Building fails with: ./bltUnixMain.c libBLT.a -ltk8.4 -ltcl8.4 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 - ljpeg -lm /usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: can't locate file for: -ljpeg -- Package manager version: 0.28.5 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Sep 1 09:17:

Re: [Fink-devel] SetPKG_CONFIG_PATH

Am 12.12.2006 um 02:30 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > You certainly could set PKG_CONFIG_PATH in a CompileScript, however. Yes, this an opportunity, too! I already had to patch libwmf.info to make it find /sw/lib/freetype219/bin/freetype-config before /usr/ X11R6/bin/freetype-config. And it even

[Fink-devel] SetPKG_CONFIG_PATH

Hello! I am trying to re-build gtk+2 with pango1-xft2-ft219 to have GTK+ libraries that do not use /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype to built a working GNU Emacs 23 with Fink's libfreetype219 and with a working font-backend and with working font anti-aliasing – the latter probably needs GTK+ for

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Am 09.11.2006 um 21:05 schrieb Martin Costabel: > It is from RangerRick's experimental tree, to be found buried in > the svn repository on finkproject.org. You can get it from websvn > at this address (plus the corresponging *.patch: >

Re: [Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Am 09.11.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Peter Dyballa wrote: >> Hello! >> To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution (http:// >> scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=XeTeX&) >> we need a li

[Fink-devel] freetype219-shlibs-2.1.9-3

Hello! To create xdvipdfmx from the XeTeX distribution (http:// scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=XeTeX&) we need a libfreetype2 with these two functions: _FT_GetFile_From_Mac_ATS_Name _FT_New_Face_From_FSSpec Can you correct the making of libfreetype

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

Am 05.09.2006 um 15:22 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > But what happened just before this? Before these steps of selfupdate/update-all, *days* before, libjasper was installed. > fink usually tries to remove a package that is buildconflicted. > What you're showing looks like what I said before:

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

Am 05.09.2006 um 04:41 schrieb Alexander Hansen: You never specified explicity what happened so i don't really have enough information to tell you more about what you could have done. If it failed because of a build conflict being swapped back in prematurely, then this generally goes away with

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

Am 04.09.2006 um 01:34 schrieb Alexander Hansen: >> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because >> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my >> permission? Even the package gets re-installed afterwards? > > The engine isn't perfect--it will try to put the c

[Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

Hello! When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my permission? Even the package gets re-installed afterwards? When then doing the re-build and re-install by hand, the complete /sw/ share/ghostscript/8.51 bran

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

Am 03.09.2006 um 16:04 schrieb Peter Dyballa: When then doing the re-build and re-install by hand, the complete / sw/share/ghostscript/8.51 branch was removed. This is not the proper method! Sorry! This is my fault: I had my own examples directory still in the old 'transitional&

Re: [Fink-devel] ttfmkfontdir-1.0-2

Am 29.01.2006 um 09:33 schrieb Martin Costabel: For the msttcorefonts package, I am pretty confident that ttfmkfontdir can indeed be replaced. I am putting a new version into 10.{3,4*}/unstable, but I cannot test all possible versions of X11/xfree/xorg, so I'll wait for some user feedback

[Fink-devel] ttfmkfontdir-1.0-2

Hello! This seems to be one of the last packages that still depend on freetype and not freetype2. On ttfmkfontdir depend msttcorefonts and xfonts-intl. Is there no way to 'port' ttfmkfontdir to freetype2 or freetype219? The other packages that depend on freetype are: dvilib2, dvilib2-dev,