Hi,
tried on my machine to move duff.info to the local tree and it build fine
(and seems to work fine too).
Please, could someone check and move it to 10.7 too?
best
sven
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in ac
ir OpenSSL, but I've spent too much
time on this already. I'm not curious enough to find out.
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Sven de Vries wrote:
> Dear Mr. Fujinaka,
>
> thank you very much for maintaining alpine of fink.
>
> however, with the update yesterday to 1.13, it seems my al
Hi,
>>> Given, that alpine with cvs1.8-info _was_ using the
>>> system-openssl-library 097 [until a week ago] (and was working fine from
>>> my perspective),
>>> I'm wondering what has changed, that this doesn't work anymore?
>>
>> You may not have gone back far enough. Quoting the maintainer fr
Hi,
> IIRC, new alpine needs openssl098 whereas OS X comes with openssl097.
that's a bit surprising to me, since:
*Alpine-2.0 has been out since around august 2008. and on the alpine
web-page, i can't find any reference to a more recent version.
*also, alpine-2.0-1 was building fine and runnin
Hi,
> You may not have gone back far enough. Quoting the maintainer from
> earlier in the thread:
>
> "Alpine will NOT compile with system ssl on released versions of OS X."
>
> Did you have 2.0-1 installed?
yes. I was happily using alpine until about 10days ago, when a series of
updates to the
Hi,
> The current version of alpine appears to require OpenSSL 0.9.8. Since
> the system doesn't have that, the openssl dependency was switched to use
> Fink's.
that's what i can't understand (yet):
if I compare the alpine.info files (cvs 1.8 and 1.14 corresponding to
alpine-2.0-1 and -6)
I see
Hi,
> Perhaps the certificates can go into /sw/etc/ssl/certs ?
thanks for the pointer, that turns out to be one way out.
Only, given the time it takes to shuffle certificates around and discover
the appropriate means and location, i was wondering, whether fink is going
for some snowy reasons f
Hi,
yes, I had a problem with it a while ago and suggested a patch
which worked for me fine. Given Martin's questions, I tried again a
rebuild with the unpatched file and surprisingly the unpatched version
worked fine.
best
sven
>
> Hi Jesse,
>
> There was a dicussion a few weeks ago about t
Hi there,
as pine-ssl seems to have no maintainer:
is there any hope, that pine-ssl might be upgraded from 4.61 to 4.64 too
(there is a non-ssl pine-4.64 already)?
4.64 fixes some security issues in earlier versions and has some new
features.
best
sven
