Hi All,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> | I really wish I could propose some magic that would make everyone happy in
> | the upgrade process, but I can not.
Is package refactoring something that's planned for the future? I've
hit this a couple of times before, and the response has always been
don't renam
Hi Mike,
On 22/02/2005, at 8:51 AM, Michael wrote:
ok people's this is a bit embarrassing, but please bear with me. I
just learned about the fink validate thing last night. Now when I
try to validate my glib2 package, I get an error about the patch.
Validating package file glib2.info...
Failed
Hey Mike,
On 20/02/2005, at 7:55 PM, Michael wrote:
One Step further on that the fontconfig2-dev package that I molded
for the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree requires freetype-2.1.4 or later, which is
currently not there, and on the freedesktop X libs, if by blockers,
he meant what I am about to say, I apolo
All,
On 21/02/2005, at 6:36 PM, Nigel Stanger wrote:
On 21/2/2005 1:49 AM, Peter O'Gorman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus:
If I recall correctly, the problems come when you have an app that
needs
fontconfig and also needs a lib that uses the new fontconfig, both
the older
fontconfig in /usr/X11R6
Hi Peter,
On 20/02/2005, at 11:38 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
|> Not at all a stupid question – I was going to ask the same thing
(in
|> relation to the fontconfig2-dev packages). I understand that it
forces
|> libraries/executables to link against a specific version of a
library
|> (i.e. in the c
ender, Render,
FontConfig, et al) I'd seriously like to look at this now (or at least
open up conversation) - I'm happy to maintain packages for these
libraries (given that I need them) if we decide to go ahead...
thanks all,
Tony Arnold
---
Hi Mike,
On 17/02/2005, at 9:45 AM, Michael wrote:
ok I recreated the problem to post the output. So that maybe if
someone knows more than me could tell if the way I fixed it is not the
only way. I archived my existing /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11 folders, and
did a fresh install of XDarwin. Then a
ormation will be included - you'll generally find this
specified under the SetCFLAGS field.
Let us know if you get stuck! I've been helping fix the more common
Darwin/Mac OS X problems in GNOME CVS HEAD lately, so GNOME 2.10+
should compile without a whole lot of modi
Matthias/All,
On 01/02/2005, at 6:14 PM, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
For my upcoming lilypond 2.5.x package, I need a pango that a) is
newer than 1.4 and b) does not link against the system freetype2.
I have therefore a) upgraded the pango packages to 1.6 (I believe the
latest version that does not
Kurt,
On 14/01/2005, at 9:19 AM, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> So the questions are:
>
> * Has any group done this before and what lessons are
> you willing to share?
> * How would you go about this if you had the freedom
> to do it anyway you want?
> * If you kept a network fink tree how would you expor
I just located Masanori Sekino's GNOME 2.2.0 work in experimental :)
Exactly what I was looking for!
-Tony
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives m
Hi all,
I've been a long time fink user, but only recently have my skills come
up to a level where I would feel comfortable offering help. I have
spent some time over the last few days bringing some of the core
dependencies for GNOME 2.2.1 up to their relevant releases on my
machine, and given
12 matches
Mail list logo
