Re: [Fink-devel] ATK and GTK

2010-05-19 Thread David Lowe
On 18 May, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Thank you, Mr. Macks for providing a happily detailed answer to my question. Naturally, now that i know more i have some more [and hopefully more focused] questions. > Using -dead_strip on a binary FOO prunes libs > that are not actually

Re: [Fink-devel] ATK and GTK

2010-05-18 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:19:06PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5/15/10 5:19 PM, David Lowe wrote: > > I'm nearly through [i think] with the freeciv-gtk2 package. There is a > > remaining issue that i'm not sure the best way to handl

Re: [Fink-devel] ATK and GTK

2010-05-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/15/10 5:19 PM, David Lowe wrote: > I'm nearly through [i think] with the freeciv-gtk2 package. There is a > remaining issue that i'm not sure the best way to handle. Upstream lists ATK > as a dependency, yet it gets stripped out with "Se

[Fink-devel] ATK and GTK

2010-05-15 Thread David Lowe
I'm nearly through [i think] with the freeciv-gtk2 package. There is a remaining issue that i'm not sure the best way to handle. Upstream lists ATK as a dependency, yet it gets stripped out with "SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs". When i inquired about this on the freeciv-dev list,