Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > I'm sure everyone would be happy to have simple universal binary support > in Fink Not me. I don't have any machine that needs universal binaries, I have only ppcs and intels. As a user, I don't want to spend twice the compilation time for every package and use twice th

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-19 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michal Suchanek wrote: | And as they do not use dpkg their system might be easier to hack to | support universal binaries than fink :) Don't see how dpkg has anything to do with it, the problem is with the software's build process itself; the fink/de

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-19 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 12/02/2008, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > DJamé Seddah wrote: > > | Thanks for you long answer but I wonder how come it seems more > | feasible in the macport project ? > | http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/wiki/ > | FAQ

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-11 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DJamé Seddah wrote: | Thanks for you long answer but I wonder how come it seems more | feasible in the macport project ? | http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/wiki/ | FAQ#IsMacPortsUniversal | I know that it's not possible for every package (

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-11 Thread DJamé Seddah
> (..) > Not to burst your bubble, but I've thought about this a lot (and built > probably 40 individual KDE dependencies as universal packages > manually) > and it's just not feasible. > Thanks for you long answer but I wonder how come it seems more feasible in the macport project ? http://

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-10 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander K. Hansen wrote: | fink selfupdate CFLAGS="-arc i386 -arch ppc" | | and then hopping that all the makefile will get the new propagated | CFLAGS and maybe modify the apt.conf to take that into account. That will work for basically nothing in

Re: [Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Saturday 09 February 2008 01:15:11 pm DJamé Seddah wrote: > Hi, > I would like to know if it would be possible to use fink to build a > whole universal binary hierarchy under /sw ? > > the idea is to have a shared directory using nfs for ppc and x86 > so if it exists an option to add to fink.con

[Fink-devel] An option to build universal binaries ?

2008-02-09 Thread DJamé Seddah
Hi, I would like to know if it would be possible to use fink to build a whole universal binary hierarchy under /sw ? the idea is to have a shared directory using nfs for ppc and x86 so if it exists an option to add to fink.conf, that would be nice to let me know Regards, Djamé -