On Sep 13, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 13 Sep 2008, at 19:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
on the other hand,
(>= %v-1) together with (<= %v-)
should work, and be equivalent, no ?
I.e., something like
Depends: foo (>= %v-1), foo (<= %v-)
JF
It appears to
On Sep 13, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 13 Sep 2008, at 19:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
on the other hand,
(>= %v-1) together with (<= %v-)
should work, and be equivalent, no ?
I.e., something like
Depends: foo (>= %v-1), foo (<= %v-)
JF
I'd asked abou
On Sep 13, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Hansen wrote:
I didn't realize it, but fink supports a dependency of the form
( = ) without specifying a revision.
If all octave-using packages agree to use Depends: octave ( = ) | octa
On 13 Sep 2008, at 19:09, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> on the other hand,
> (>= %v-1) together with (<= %v-)
> should work, and be equivalent, no ?
I.e., something like
Depends: foo (>= %v-1), foo (<= %v-)
JF
-
T
On 13 Sep 2008, at 18:34, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> I didn't realize it, but fink supports a dependency of the form
>> ( = ) without specifying a revision.
>>
>> If all octave-using packages agree to use Depends: octave (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> I didn't realize it, but fink supports a dependency of the form
> ( = ) without specifying a revision.
>
> If all octave-using packages agree to use Depends: octave ( = version> ) | octave-atlas ( = ) [or an equivalent]
>
I didn't realize it, but fink supports a dependency of the form
( = ) without specifying a revision.
If all octave-using packages agree to use Depends: octave ( = ) | octave-atlas ( = ) [or an equivalent]
rather than ( >=-1), then that will satisfy the prior
breakage issue in a simpler packa
