Why is it called "polyml5"?
dan
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:13:59PM -0400, John Ridgway wrote:
> So now I'm going to have polyml5 and polyml1-shlibs as a SplitOff?
>
> Peace
> - John
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:43:03PM -0400, John Ridg
So now I'm going to have polyml5 and polyml1-shlibs as a SplitOff?
Peace
- John
On Mar 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:43:03PM -0400, John Ridgway wrote:
>> Friends -
>> I have a question. First the background. I have a package that I'm
>> currently worki
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 04:43:03PM -0400, John Ridgway wrote:
> Friends -
> I have a question. First the background. I have a package that I'm
> currently working on (polyml5), and it builds a shared library. The
> package is at version 5.1, and the shared library that it builds is
> libpo
Friends -
I have a question. First the background. I have a package that I'm
currently working on (polyml5), and it builds a shared library. The
package is at version 5.1, and the shared library that it builds is
libpolyml.1.dylib. This library has the appropriate install-name and
compa
