[Fink-devel] Re: flat namespaces redux

2003-02-03 Thread Benjamin Reed
Well, I think that building thing two level namespace ought to be the libtool default also, flat_namespace is needed for some things but causes problems for many others, how about trying both by default? cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress blah

[Fink-devel] Re: flat namespaces redux

2003-02-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:01 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress blah 1. libkdeui's LIBADD is -lkdecore 2. the first half of the link complains that -lqt-mt is indirectly referenced 3. it builds the library

[Fink-devel] Re: flat namespaces redux

2003-02-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:23:04AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:01 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress blah 1. libkdeui's LIBADD is -lkdecore 2. the first half of the link

[Fink-devel] Re: flat namespaces redux

2003-02-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: He suggested changing it to -multiply_defined suppress prebind, which seems to be the solution, if libtool doesn't want to support specifying the namespace on the libtool command-line. This would make libtool default to making