On Monday, Jun 9, 2003, at 20:32 US/Eastern, Neil Tiffin wrote:
I agree with Chris. I use the beta Eudora with Bayesian filering and
it works great. 20 to 40 junk mails per day correctly identified with
only 3 to 5 per week that get missed and none (so far) incorrectly
identified as junk.
I
Yo folks,
sadly we are getting more and more spam on this list. I have to wonder
if we after all should make it moderated like fink-users, too (that
essentially means that only members can post to the list; non-member
will have to be approved by the list admin).
I am not exactly fond of the
Hi Max. I think it is tolerable for now. Can we encourage SF to hurry
up a bit with the spam filters? It would be better to wait for them,
if we can...
-- Dave
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
If my vote counts, mark it down as an emphatic no. Making things more
cumbersome for humans is not a good way to deal with spam. I use
SpamAssassin on my mailserver and the *only* Fink spam I've ever seen
is when someone on the list has hit reply-all on a spam message.
Pressure on SF.net is
I agree with Chris. I use the beta Eudora with Bayesian filering and
it works great. 20 to 40 junk mails per day correctly identified with
only 3 to 5 per week that get missed and none (so far) incorrectly
identified as junk.
I have not seen one junk mail actually in the fink list.
Neil
