On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:54:42 +0200, Max Horn wrote:
Am 22.04.2011 um 23:23 schrieb Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
libraries buried in subdirs so that they do
We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and libraries
buried in subdirs so that they do not mask system (x11) supplied versions of
those same packages. Maintainers must explicitly set some flag(s) to make them
visible. And often experiment and hack to make sure they are
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
libraries buried in subdirs so that they do not mask system (x11)
supplied versions of those same packages. [...]
Is it time to unbury these libraries?
Along the same get
Am 22.04.2011 um 23:23 schrieb Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:20 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
We've long had xft2-dev and fontconfig2-dev keep their headers and
libraries buried in subdirs so that they do not mask system (x11)
supplied versions of those same
