On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Mar 17, 2004, at 1:22 PM, jfm wrote:
I thought this was quite correct : isn't a subdirectory a file in
itself ?
Directories are files, yes. But why doesn't du count directories on
HFS? I don't care which it does, as long
Alright, in fink cvs, du_sk now counts the same as 'du -sk' on both
filesystems. I had to remove the test for du_sk(empty directory) = 0,
since apparently it's not on UFS.
jfm, could you please test it? Thanks.
Dave
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
I have no idea what causes this _ UFS shouldn't matter here, no ?
./Command/du_sk..NOK 5# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t
at line 30)
# got: '83'
# expected: '103'
./Command/du_sk..NOK 6# Failed test (./Command/du_sk.t
at line 31)
# got:
On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:36 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
It seems this answers part of the mystery:
[Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ du -sk .
94 .
[Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t] vasi$ perl -MFink::Command=du_sk -e
'print(du_sk($_),\n) for @ARGV' .
73
[Toaster:/Volumes/TestUFS/fink/t]
On Mar 17, 2004, at 1:22 PM, jfm wrote:
I thought this was quite correct : isn't a subdirectory a file in
itself ?
Directories are files, yes. But why doesn't du count directories on
HFS? I don't care which it does, as long as it's consistent.
I'd like to both keep du_sk consistent with du, but
