Re: [Fink-devel] failure building perl581 module

2007-01-20 Thread David Reiser
On 20 Jan 2007, at 11:44:53 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > My guess here is that you left out the "Type: perl" line? The > default CompileScript is different for "Type: perl" packages than it > is for most packages. That is the problem (or rather, I deleted it because I thought I was specifyi

Re: [Fink-devel] failure building perl581 module

2007-01-20 Thread David R. Morrison
My guess here is that you left out the "Type: perl" line? The default CompileScript is different for "Type: perl" packages than it is for most packages. The easiest way to create the legacy package is just to use the same .info file as before, but we "Type: perl (581)" (which will just re

[Fink-devel] failure building perl581 module

2007-01-20 Thread David Reiser
When I started maintaining finance-quotehist, I didn't fully test all the versions when I created the multiple version info file. Now I'm trying to split out the 581 version as a legacy at the same time I'm adding a 588 version to the main info file I'm planning on maintaining. I have disco