Daniel,
Why do you say that 'info /sw/share/info/gcc-fsf-4.5' is
need? With my currently proposed packaging a simple
'info gcc-fsf-4.5' is sufficient to find the renamed info
file in /sw/share/info with or without the main gcc45
symlink package installed.
Jack
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:15:18AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel,
Why do you say that 'info /sw/share/info/gcc-fsf-4.5' is
need? With my currently proposed packaging a simple
'info gcc-fsf-4.5' is sufficient to find the renamed info
file in /sw/share/info with or without the main gcc45
On 04/27/2010 12:08 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I've posted test packaging for a gcc45-4.5.0-1001
and gcc45-compiler-4.5-1 package on fink tracking...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2992713group_id=17203atid=414256
The new gcc45 packaging...
1) Moves all of the currently
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:24:42AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On 04/27/2010 12:08 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I've posted test packaging for a gcc45-4.5.0-1001
and gcc45-compiler-4.5-1 package on fink tracking...
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack Howarth wrote:
To recap, the problem with using a single package with split-off
strategy is that both gcc4x and gcc4x-bin would require a Conflicts/
Replaces on the older gcc4x packages which have overlapping files.
This is because the older gcc4x packages
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack Howarth wrote:
To recap, the problem with using a single package with split-off
strategy is that both gcc4x and gcc4x-bin would require a Conflicts/
Replaces on the older gcc4x packages
On 27 Apr 2010, at 18:07, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack Howarth wrote:
To recap, the problem with using a single package with split-off
strategy is that both gcc4x and gcc4x-bin would require a
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:20:41PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 18:07, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack Howarth wrote:
To recap, the problem with using a single package with
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack Howarth wrote:
To recap, the problem with using a single package with split-off
strategy is that both gcc4x and gcc4x-bin would require a Conflicts/
Replaces on the older gcc4x
On 27 Apr 2010, at 18:50, Jack Howarth wrote:
Bascially, I would have to have...
SplitOff:
Package: %N-bin
Files:
bin
No bin ; this the point : bin contains only symlinks, which go into
gcc45
lib
share
JF
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:50:43PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:20:41PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 18:07, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Jack
JF,
Okay. Untested gcc45-x86_64.info with a gcc45-compiler
splitoff. Still needs the libffi update-alternatives.
Jack
Info2:
Package: gcc45
Version: 4.5.0
Revision: 1001
Source: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/gcc-%v/gcc-%v.tar.bz2
Source-MD5: ff27b7c4a5d5060c8a8543a44abca31f
Jack Howarth wrote:
JF,
Okay. Untested gcc45-x86_64.info with a gcc45-compiler
splitoff. Still needs the libffi update-alternatives.
To me, this one looks OK (untested, of course), contrary to the
description in one of dmacks' latest messages (the one with *1, *2 etc),
which even after
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:40:35PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
JF,
Okay. Untested gcc45-x86_64.info with a gcc45-compiler
splitoff. Still needs the libffi update-alternatives.
To me, this one looks OK (untested, of course), contrary to the
description in one of
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
# Rename info files with -fsf-4.5 suffix.
# Add symlinks for info files under old names.
SplitOff2:
Package: %N-compiler
Files:
share/info/*-fsf-4.5.info
InfoDocs: cp-tools-fsf-4.5.info cpp-fsf-4.5.info
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:00:11PM -0400, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
# Rename info files with -fsf-4.5 suffix.
# Add symlinks for info files under old names.
SplitOff2:
Package: %N-compiler
Files:
Daniel,
I noticed that when --program-suffix=-fsf-4.5 is invoked
that the man1 and man3 manpage names are automatically appended
with the -fsf-4.5 suffix but not the info pages. I figured this
was an omission so I completed the renaming for man7 and the
info pages. Also, now that multiple
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:51:36AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel,
I noticed that when --program-suffix=-fsf-4.5 is invoked
that the man1 and man3 manpage names are automatically appended
with the -fsf-4.5 suffix but not the info pages. I figured this
was an omission so I completed the
I've posted test packaging for a gcc45-4.5.0-1001
and gcc45-compiler-4.5-1 package on fink tracking...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2992713group_id=17203atid=414256
The new gcc45 packaging...
1) Moves all of the currently conflicting files between the gcc4x packages
into a
19 matches
Mail list logo
