Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> > Maybe somebody
> > else can make a new 0.4.1 installer? I'll be happy to talk you through
> > the process...
>
> In case this is still needed, I made one. It looks OK to me, but since I
> had never touched PackageMake
Can someone please test Martin's installer package? You'll need at 10.1.x
system to test it. (I won't have access to a 10.1.x system until next
Monday at the earliest, myself.) Not only should you test that it installs
OK, but you should check what happens if you use the installer severl
times i
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> > []
> > What my "fix" does is to alter the .pax.gz file with the contents of the
> > installation so that the permission on "." is 1755 in the directory
> > instead of 0700.
>
> What did you do with the bom file? Not on
Dear Fink Developers,
As you may have seen in a few recent messages, there is a serious problem
with the fink 0.4.1 binary installer which occurs if a user installs using
the installer twice. The permissions on the root directory of the machine
are altered, and the machine no longer boots!
I've
