[Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
I just noticed that the build structure used by the itcl.info and itk.info files don't allow building with --build-as-nobody. In that case, the build fails with errors of the form... make -j1 install prefix=/sw/src/fink.build/root-itcl-3.4-1/sw /usr/bin/install -c libitcl3.4.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Jack Howarth wrote: I just noticed that the build structure used by the itcl.info and itk.info files don't allow building with --build-as-nobody. In that case, the build fails with errors of the form... This is one of the main reasons build-as-nobody was invented, namely to catch bugs like

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Martin, I'll fix this tonight in the itcl-x86_64.info and itk-x86_64.info x86_64 variants I created. I agree that these should be fixed. I am trying to build everything on x86_64 with -m to catch these. There also needs to be a iwidgets_x86_64 variant as well (which I have) so that the build is

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
This is really my fault for not catching it (I must have failed to use --build-as-nobody when checking). Unfortunately, I need to ask for help correcting it. Bill William G. Scott Contact info: http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/ I wouldn't call this fairly unusual, there are many

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with --build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in /sw/share/man Installing body.n ... /bin/sh: /sw/share/man/mann/scope.n: Permission

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with --build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in /sw/share/man Installing body.n ... /bin/sh:

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with -- build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: This is strange. Do you have a different make installed? Or a different fink version? Same happens with /usr/bin/make when I removed the fink one. The explanation is simpler (?): When you run first fink build itcl and then fink --build-as-nobody rebuild