Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 13, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-11 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/8/14, 5:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-11 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/8/14, 5:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 11/8/14, 5:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-09 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/8/14, 5:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM,

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread David Fang
Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread David Fang
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 11/8/14, 3:33 PM, David Fang wrote: On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 11/8/14, 1:03 PM, David Fang wrote: Alex, On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-06 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or

[Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-04 Thread David Fang
Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or on older darwin @executable_path or @loader_path). This was a decision

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm35/clang35 validation requires @rpath acceptance in shlib validation

2014-11-04 Thread Alexander Hansen
On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:07 AM, David Fang f...@csl.cornell.edu wrote: Hi all, Sitting in my experimental tree is a draft of llvm35's packaging that bootstraps (much like its predecessor llvm34), but fails Shlib validation because the install_names for shlibs all start with @rpath (or