On 24 Mar 2007, at 02:03, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> i.e., in fact (on 10.4), linking to 0.9.7l libs using 0.9.7i headers
> (cf {,/usr/bin/}openssl version)
> (# fgrep -rI OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER /{usr,sw}/include/openssl/
> opensslv.h
>> /usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h:#define OPENSSL_VERSIO
On 23 Mar 2007, at 21:03, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> The general preference these days is to link to the OpenSSL libraries
> that ship with the OS, because
i.e., in fact (on 10.4), linking to 0.9.7l libs using 0.9.7i headers
(cf {,/usr/bin/}openssl version)
(# fgrep -rI OPENSSL_VERSION_
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> there are currently several openssl packages:
> openssl* (which is 0.9.6, actually)
> openssl097*
> system-openssl-dev
>
> I wonder why openssl package is left at an older version…
> Which of these is preferred to be set as dependency?
>
> p.s. actually, 0.9.8 branch is a
there are currently several openssl packages:
openssl* (which is 0.9.6, actually)
openssl097*
system-openssl-dev
I wonder why openssl package is left at an older version…
Which of these is preferred to be set as dependency?
p.s. actually, 0.9.8 branch is already out for some time…
--
Alexey Zak
