The package page in the pdb isn't updating properly, so it's nothing you
did or didn't do. The summary page works OK and the links to the .info
files go to the right place.
Yeah I noticed. After making the rev number 100 higher for the 10.5 info file
as suggested by Dan Macks, it looks
Nope. Leave the name as tcoffee, and make sure that tcoffee-10.4 has
Distribution: 10.4 and tcoffee-10.5 has Distribution: 10.5 . fink
will then do the right thing and pick the appropriate version for the
OS.
Ok, thanks - it should be all fine in cvs. Although on the package database, it
Koen van der Drift wrote:
Nope. Leave the name as tcoffee, and make sure that tcoffee-10.4 has
Distribution: 10.4 and tcoffee-10.5 has Distribution: 10.5 . fink
will then do the right thing and pick the appropriate version for the
OS.
Ok, thanks - it should be all fine in cvs.
moving to fink-devel...
On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
The user-friendly solution would be to have two packages, one for
10.4 that depends on -pm586, and one for 10.5 that depends on -
pm588. In this way, users don't need to install Fink perl packages,
the system
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
moving to fink-devel...
On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
The user-friendly solution would be to have two packages, one for
10.4 that depends on -pm586, and one for 10.5 that depends on -
pm588. In this way, users
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:55:13PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
moving to fink-devel...
On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
The user-friendly solution would be to have two packages, one for
10.4 that depends
