Re: [Fink-devel] redistributability

2003-01-30 Thread Max Horn
At 7:55 Uhr +0100 30.01.2003, David wrote: On Donnerstag, J=E4nner 30, 2003, at 06:10 Uhr, Carsten Klapp wrote: Yes this is a complicated case for those of us like me who are not=20 lawyers. ;) The license wording seems to speak specifically more to=20 end-users than packagers like fink. Fo

Re: [Fink-devel] redistributability

2003-01-29 Thread David
On Donnerstag, Jänner 30, 2003, at 06:10 Uhr, Carsten Klapp wrote: Yes this is a complicated case for those of us like me who are not lawyers. ;) The license wording seems to speak specifically more to end-users than packagers like fink. Fortunately we have lawyers at our side, our legal depa

Re: [Fink-devel] redistributability

2003-01-29 Thread Carsten Klapp
Yes this is a complicated case for those of us like me who are not lawyers. ;) The license wording seems to speak specifically more to end-users than packagers like fink. Debian linux does distribute tomcat in their' contrib tree. Hmm... How about sending the authors an e-mail directly, ask the

[Fink-devel] redistributability

2003-01-29 Thread Benjamin Reed
A number of the things needed for tomcat are under a sun license that basically removes all rights and then lists the exceptions that you're allowed to do. They *appear* like they may actually be redistributable, but I'm not entirely sure, I was wondering if I could have your opinions on the m