On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 08:14 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 13:35 Uhr +0900 25.03.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything
>> with nothing installed, you should build again with everything
>> installed. Building twice like this will find b
At 13:35 Uhr +0900 25.03.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything with
>nothing installed, you should build again with everything installed.
>Building twice like this will find both missing Depends and
>Conflicts...
>
>I think it is a great ide
At 20:10 Uhr -0800 24.03.2002, Kaben wrote:
>Re: interactive packages such as Qt:
>
>free/netbsd ports/pkgsrc have a mechanism for handling this.
>`interactive' patches have variable `IS_INTERACTIVE' set true; build mode
>can be unset in which case everything is built, `BATCH' in which case
>int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mozilla 0.99-had/has a hidden depends, i'm pretty sure. I am not sure
what, because when I tried to build it with a basic X setup it would not
compile. After everything else I wanted was installed tho, it compiled
fine (but slooowly). I am sorry, b
I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything
with nothing installed, you should build again with everything
installed. Building twice like this will find both missing
Depends and Conflicts...
I think it is a great idea.
Peter
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Max Hor
Re: interactive packages such as Qt:
free/netbsd ports/pkgsrc have a mechanism for handling this.
`interactive' patches have variable `IS_INTERACTIVE' set true; build mode
can be unset in which case everything is built, `BATCH' in which case
interactive packages are skipped, or `INTERACTIVE'
Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Fink packages normally. QT requires it (to confirm the license; is
> this really necessary?). And Atlas requires it too (makes sense in
> this case, though).
It is technically possible to put an "echo yes |" before the configure
in qt; the previous maintain
For the stable bindist, I plan to write a special batch mode strict
dependency checker, and I'd love to hear your comments on this idea,
and possibly suggestions on how to improve upon it.
How it works: it first removes all non-essential packages from the
system; then it "fink install"s the p
