[Fink-devel] tetex and system-tetex. Anyone can help me?

2004-04-02 Thread Andrea Riciputi
Hi, some weeks ago I posted a message asking for help. Nobody answered, so I re-try hoping to be luckier. I'm trying to build a package for PyX (http://pyx.sourceforge.net/). It is a Python module that allows the user to create high-quality plot and figure (something like MetaPost, but with

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and system-tetex. Anyone can help me?

2004-04-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Apr 2, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: Hi, some weeks ago I posted a message asking for help. Nobody answered, so I re-try hoping to be luckier. I'm trying to build a package for PyX (http://pyx.sourceforge.net/). It is a Python module that allows the user to create high-quality

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and system-tetex. Anyone can help me?

2004-04-02 Thread Andrea Riciputi
I've already thought about something like this, but the variants become 4 since the already double -py22 and -py23. Maintaing them could be impratical... Any comment? Andrea. On 2 Apr 2004, at 16:56, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You could make two separate variants: one that requires

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and system-tetex. Anyone can help me?

2004-04-02 Thread Martin Costabel
On 2 avr. 2004, at 16:19, Andrea Riciputi wrote: [] Depends: python23|python23-nox, tetex-base|system-tetex, ghostscript | ghostscript-nox, ghostscript-fonts BuildDepends: tetex-dev|system-tetex I get the an 'error-node' error message, since system-tetex already provides tetex-base. How can I

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and system-tetex. Anyone can help me?

2004-04-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Apr 2, 2004, at 10:22 AM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: I've already thought about something like this, but the variants become 4 since the already double -py22 and -py23. Maintaing them could be impratical... Any comment? Andrea. On 2 Apr 2004, at 16:56, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You could