On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 06:52 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Chris Devers wrote:
>> The new version of nessus-plugins can't get past ./configure:
> []
>> ### ./configure failed, exit code 1
>> Failed: compiling nessus-plugins-1.2.3-1 failed
>
> Justin is probably using bash as his /b
Here is what the package maintainer told me:
>
>As in message, libvorbis holds libvorbis-shlibs and you cannnot replace
>libvorbis-shlib with libvorbis0-shlibs. Please remove libvorbis before
>you install libvorbis0(-shlibs).
>
>If you are using apt-get, it can resolve these situation by removing
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 04:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Under unstable/crypto, there is no mozilla. I guess, either that
> build got pulled, or I need to do something to get my local package
> list updated. "fink index" does nothing. Any suggestions?
> -Matt
You need to run f
MacOS X 10.1.5
December Developer Tools
GNU Make version 3.79
fink --version
Package manager version: 0.9.12
Distribution version: 0.4.0.cvs
xmms and intltool install failed with the same error:
% fink install xmms
sudo /sw/bin/fink install xmms
Password:
Information about 1344 packages read in
Well, I checked in /sw/share/gtkhtml/ and Editor.idl' was missing. I
don't know why.
I did 'fink rebuild gtkhtml'
After that, evolution-1.0.7-1 installed with no problems.
Thanks,
Pedro
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welc
Sorry to bother the list with another mozilla question, but... I
successfully installed the 1.0.0 version of mozilla a few days ago,
using the helpful tips from the list. Yesterday I had to reinstall my
OS, so today I'm trying to reproduce things. After installing fink, I
find that mozilla-1
FYI fellas:
dpkg --remove --force-depends gnome-vfs-ssl was the only way I could get fink to go all the way thru because even with trying to update gnome-vfs-ssl fink tries to satisfy the dependency with gnome-mime-data which won't install because the version check fails on gnome-vfs-ssl. When I fo
William McCallum wrote:
> If anybody has been using these packages, please let me know whether
> they have been working for you, and what has been going wrong if they
> haven't.
I have played with maxima and saw some bugs:
Some built-in paths are not right, for example
(C1) example(laplace);
C
> >> analog-5.24-1
Seems to work perfectly. I haven't *seriously* banged on it, but it
does everything I've tried without complaint. I have tons of prior Analog
experience on FreeBSD- I just dropped some config files in and ran. If
you're looking for more than a guess, I could probably run so
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
[]
> Well, if it is a c-only app, no, it does not need to be rebuilt. If it
> uses c++, then it needs to be rebuilt, or else it will not work. gcc3
> breaks c++ binary compatibility because it now conforms (almost) to the
> ISO C++ standard. Version 3.2, afaik, will have
If anybody has been using these packages, please let me know whether
they have been working for you, and what has been going wrong if they
haven't.
Thanks,
Bill McCallum
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
Hi,
I have modified the mutt-1.4i distribution (non-ssl) with 2 patches
for reading usenet with mutt (works quite well) and having compressed
folders.
Where should I send these for inclusion with the fink dist?
C.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rubberduck.com/yeled/pgp.txt
-
Paul INDELICATO wrote:
[]
> > * LaTeX2e: (latex).LaTeXe help 1.6.
> > install-info: replacing existing dir entry for `latex'
> > /bin/sh ./../mkinstalldirs /sw/bin
This is bad. During the build phase, nothing in /sw/ should be touched,
everything should be done in /sw/src/root-*
[]
>
Hi!
I am currently trying to resinstall tetex after removing my older fink
install (when I did an update yesterday all my packges became marked
"obsolescent" and I could not find a way to install more recent one
directly with dselect). I then installed fink 0.4a. All went well until
trying to inst
Jeremy Erwin wrote:
> I was messing about with xman, and I discovered that the overwhelming
> majority of man files are displayed as postscript source (i.e.
> %PS-Adobe-3.0 ...)
This is a good one :-) Seems nobody else is using xman...
Actually, from looking at the xman sources, it appears th
Ben Hines wrote:
[]
> Martin you posted this a month ago (below). :) The fix (supposedly?) is
> to update "gnome-vfs-ssl" first. or, "gnome-vfs" if you have that one.
>
> "fink update gnome-vfs-ssl"
Yes, but after Sarah's reply to that, I had to write (and this worked)
> I see. Seems to be one
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 01:13 AM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
>
>
> I don't want db4 to be gone, I need it for some (non-Fink-packaged)
> applications I have installed that require db4 and don't work with
> db3. But the strange thing is, after it does this, I still have both
> db3 and db4 ins
Hi,
I was doing a fink selfupdate, and got the following:
Setting up db3-shlibs (3.3.11-7) ...
dpkg -i
/usr/local/fink/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11-7_darwin-powerpc.deb
Selecting previously deselected package db3.
dpkg: considering removing db4 in favour of db3
18 matches
Mail list logo
