Martin Sarajervi wrote:
> * Martin Costabel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >Martin Sarajervi wrote:
> >[]
> >
> >>You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11.
> >>This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to
> >>install xfree86-base again. (The pack
Adam Atlas wrote:
> []
> can't download. I checked one mirror, and it looks like the directory
> structure has changed. Now, instead of
> /pub/GNOME/sources/1.0/eel-1.0.2.tar.bz2 for example, it would be
> /pub/GNOME/sources/eel/1.0/eel-1.0.2.tar.bz2 . The change is that now
> they're additionall
Is openh323 missing, even from unstable? Thanks -Joe
--
[G3:root/root_v3.03.04-macosx10.2/bin] joe# fink install openh323
Information about 1542 packages read in 5 seconds.
no package found for "openh323"
Failed: no package found for specification 'openh323'!
--
* Martin Costabel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Martin Sarajervi wrote:
> []
> >You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11.
> >This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to
> >install xfree86-base again. (The package won't be recompiled.) If you
> >wa
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Charles C. Kankelborg wrote:
> Is there any interest among Fink users in Ham Radio?
There are a few of us running the Xastir APRS program on OS X; it builds
with just a couple of tweaks, and works very well. About the only feature
not supported is kernel AX.25 (since MacOS do
Is there any interest among Fink users in Ham Radio? I'm tempted to try
compiling the following package on my Mac, and if I were lucky enough
to make it work, I could share the results...
http://www.qsl.net/kb1ens/cwtrainer/
There are, of course, many other possibilities related to ham radio.
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Ben Hines wrote:
> Indeed. However we don't really have the resources to make sure every
> package has no backdoors, obviously. "what if", Bill? Well, theres
> nothing we can do about that is there. Do you want software or not?
> Fink already is very careful about unstable/s
Hi,
I'm trying to update all my packages (fink update-all), and when it
gets to a GNOME package (the first one it gets to for me is eel) it
says it can't download. I checked one mirror, and it looks like the
directory structure has changed. Now, instead of
/pub/GNOME/sources/1.0/eel-1.0.2.tar
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 01:27 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
> _ldap_url_search
>
> It seems that -lldap is satisfied from /usr/lib/libldap.dylib, not
> from
> /sw/src/openldap-ssl-2.0.23-5/openldap-2.0.23/libraries/libldap.a, and
> the former doesn't
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 12:12 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 12:01 PM, Julien Salort wrote:
>
>>> % fink --version
>>> Package manager version: 0.10.0
>>> Distribution version: 0.4.1.cvs
>>>
>>> I thought the selfupdate command was enough
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:31 AM, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:58 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
>
>> At 1:25 -0700 10/9/02, Ben Hines wrote:
>>> Yep. If a fink package tells you its MD5 is bad, please notify the
>>> maintainer (or the list) and we will look in
>From: David Ros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Xemacs, reftex problem?
>To: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:14:49 +0200 (CEST)
>Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:14:49 +0200 (CEST)
>
>David Ros wrote:
>>
>> --- Jeff Whitaker <
>From: David Ros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Xemacs, reftex problem?
>To: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:14:49 +0200 (CEST)
>Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:14:49 +0200 (CEST)
>
>David Ros wrote:
>>
>> --- Jeff Whitaker <
David Ros wrote:
>
> --- Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>>
>> David: I've uploaded a package for xemacs-21.4.9
>> to unstable CVS (for
>> 10.2). Please try it and let us know if it also
>> has the reftex problem.
>>
>> -Jeff
>
>
>Jeff,
>
>First thing I'll do tomorrow morning i
I get the same error as Jason and Ben. The critical command is
cc -fno-common -I../../include -I../../include -I/sw/include/db3
-I/sw/include/cyrus-sasl -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include
-L/sw/src/openldap-ssl-2.0.23-5/openldap-2.0.23/libraries -L/sw/lib -o
apitest apitest.o -lldap -llber -llutil
--- Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> David: I've uploaded a package for xemacs-21.4.9 to
> unstable CVS (for
> 10.2). Please try it and let us know if it also has
> the reftex problem.
>
> -Jeff
>
Jeff,
First thing I'll do tomorrow morning is to try that.
I'll keep the list
Hi Julien,
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 12:01 PM, Julien Salort wrote:
>> % fink --version
>> Package manager version: 0.10.0
>> Distribution version: 0.4.1.cvs
>>
>> I thought the selfupdate command was enough to get the latest fink. It
>> seems I was wrong...
>>
>> I'll get the latest ve
> % fink --version
> Package manager version: 0.10.0
> Distribution version: 0.4.1.cvs
>
> I thought the selfupdate command was enough to get the latest fink. It
> seems I was wrong...
>
> I'll get the latest version from the website then...
I have not been able to find it.
Maybe I didn't go t
I just re-built openldap-ssl twice (the second time
moving /usr/local away, just to confirm), with identical
results.
The log is perfect (only curiosity :
not updating unwritable cache ./config.cache
...
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
...
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) dis
David: I've uploaded a package for xemacs-21.4.9 to unstable CVS (for
10.2). Please try it and let us know if it also has the reftex problem.
-Jeff
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, David Ros wrote:
> So I was wondering, isn't it possible to install a
> (much) older version of xemacs via fink? (I'm thinkin
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 12:24, Alwyn wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 01:13 pm, Chris Leishman wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason to have fink install libncurses anymore?
>
> That is a very good question. I believe you posted it before, and
> no-one answered. Perhaps nobody knows?
No on
> Stephen Anderson wrote:
>
>> My main reason to use fink is to have xemacs
Have you tried this:
http://homepage.mac.com/pjarvis/xemacs.html
I don't know anything about LaTex so I have no idea whether or not this
would work for you, but it may be worth looking into. It's a native
Aqua imple
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:58 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
> At 1:25 -0700 10/9/02, Ben Hines wrote:
>> Yep. If a fink package tells you its MD5 is bad, please notify the
>> maintainer (or the list) and we will look in to it.
>>
>> Fink MD5s are stored in the .info files, locally, so a hack
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 01:13 pm, Chris Leishman wrote:
> Is there any reason to have fink install libncurses anymore?
That is a very good question. I believe you posted it before, and
no-one answered. Perhaps nobody knows?
Alwyn
-
At 1:25 -0700 10/9/02, Ben Hines wrote:
>Yep. If a fink package tells you its MD5 is bad, please notify the
>maintainer (or the list) and we will look in to it.
>
>Fink MD5s are stored in the .info files, locally, so a hacker cannot
>change them unless they hack fink CVS AND the site with the ta
Stephen Anderson wrote:
> My main reason to use fink is to have xemacs, which
I use as the only
> true editor for (La)TeX files. This has been a
happy combination for a
> long time.
>
> Recently, following the acquisition of a new dual-G4
machine that came
> with 10.2.1 installed, I have reb
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 08:38 Europe/Brussels, Ben Hines wrote:
> Doesn't compile here either. I don't think it was ever 10.2 ready, but
> was added to 10.2 tree by jfm (through drm. :) jfm can you still build
> this?
My last log is from sep 17, and clean. I don't see what might have
ch
I have jpeg-6b installed through fink
and I've done some reading from the ijg.org site
but I just don't understand what else needs to be installed
so jpeg-6b's dev headers will be recognized by the compile script
I have my environment variables set
and all that other stuff
but something is missin
> # fink --version
> Package manager version: 0.10.0.cvs
> Distribution version: 0.4.9.cvs
% fink --version
Package manager version: 0.10.0
Distribution version: 0.4.1.cvs
I thought the selfupdate command was enough to get the latest fink. It
seems I was wrong...
I'll get the latest version fro
I have successfully been using 10.2 w/ Fink on my G3 Powerbook
laptop. I have built KDE and quite a few other programs that take a
while to build and updated.
I'm getting set to update my iMac which is also a G3. Previously I
used the iMac as a build host for the Powerbook when I was running
10.1
Fink requires the installation of libncurses, along with all it's
terminfo files. But MacOSX 10.2 comes with libncurses as well. The
only difference seems to be that the apple version also has terminfo
files for supporting the Apple Terminal application correctly.
Unfortunately, fink package
First of all, it's great to hear that Fink people have thought about
the issue.
I'm just not quite sure the level of protection that affords is already
sufficient to make compilation as root a complete non-issue.
> Yep. If a fink package tells you its MD5 is bad, please notify the
> maintainer
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 12:33 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Carsten Bormann wrote:
> []
>> Given the variety of sources we use for obtaining source files, this
>> is just an accident waiting to happen over and over again in fink.
>
> This is prevented by the use of MD5 checksums in Fi
Martin Sarajervi wrote:
[]
> You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11.
> This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to
> install xfree86-base again. (The package won't be recompiled.) If you
> want
> to keep your X11 installation, install system-xf
Carsten Bormann wrote:
[]
> Given the variety of sources we use for obtaining source files, this is
> just an accident waiting to happen over and over again in fink.
This is prevented by the use of MD5 checksums in Fink.
--
Martin
---
T
35 matches
Mail list logo
