Hi Martin!
Am 22.03.2004 um 08:43 schrieb Martin Costabel:
Ralf Höling wrote:
Hi Alexander!
Am 22.03.2004 um 03:21 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
Check the permissions/ownership of /sw/fink.
Owner is System others are only allowedd to read.
What should it be?
You need it at least writable for the user
Enrico Riboni wrote:
why would you want to run an anti-virus when the number of viruses on
Mac OS X is 0.0 ?
He might want to ensure he's not acting as a carrier of windoze virii,
passing them on to wintel users...
There are valid reasons.
Actually Jim, if you're happy working on a command line yo
On Mar 21, 2004, at 10:38 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
David, et. al.,
I'm still hopeful of being able to print from Gnumeric with Gnome 2.4.
I've seen the same hopes raised by others on the list but to this date
have seen no answers. The consensus seems to be that gnomeprint is
part of the probl
Thanks :)
I did not think before I acted. I am writing a program and it interacts
with fink on a minor level but part of that interaction is to have fink
install XFree86 and I needed to know if I needed to turn that feature
off for 10.3.x . I should have installed the software from fink and not
Hi,
I had installed Mozilla 1.3 from binary, and found "fink update-all"
always failed while trying to update Mozilla to 1.5.1-1. After read
some threads in this list, I knew that it has something to do with the
freetype packages.
However, I can not remove freetype packages because other softw
Alexander-
Thanks for your response. I have removed my libgnomeprint2* and
libgnomeprintui2* files without apparent damage.
I had seen your previous post about also being unable to print from
gnumeric; hopefully, someone is working on it. Gnumeric is too useful
to remain "printless."
Regards,
On 22 mars 2004, at 19:14, Jeff Ye wrote:
Hi,
I had installed Mozilla 1.3 from binary, and found "fink update-all"
always failed while trying to update Mozilla to 1.5.1-1. After read
some threads in this list, I knew that it has something to do with the
freetype packages.
However, I can not r
Dear user list members,
I am experiencing some trouble with completely removing the package
postgresql-python-py22. (system OS X 10.2.6, beige G3, PostgreSQL
7.3.4-1)
1. Checking the package installation with "apt-get -f install" gives a
message about the erroneously installed package, and no ot
On Mar 22, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Guido Lorenz wrote:
Dear user list members,
I am experiencing some trouble with completely removing the package
postgresql-python-py22. (system OS X 10.2.6, beige G3, PostgreSQL
7.3.4-1)
1. Checking the package installation with "apt-get -f install" gives a
message a
Not really.
If I check this box, the system Apache 1.3 will be started as in the
StartupItems Script the path is 'hardcoded'.
I could write a startupItems script myself (I already have one, as I
had a selfcompiled apache2 version running before); my question was, if
there is a fink way to do thi
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 18:14, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Guido Lorenz wrote:
>
> > Dear user list members,
> >
> > I am experiencing some trouble with completely removing the package
> > postgresql-python-py22. (system OS X 10.2.6, beige G3, PostgreSQL
> > 7.3.4-1)
> >
Not really.
If I check this box, the system Apache 1.3 will be started as in the
StartupItems Script the path is 'hardcoded'.
I could write a startupItems script myself (I already have one, as I
had a selfcompiled apache2 version running before); my question was, if
there is a fink way to do thi
daemonic enable apache2
is the Fink way to set it up. daemonic is a tool that creates,
enables, disables, and removes StartupItems for some Fink-installed
packages.
On Mar 22, 2004, at 5:13 PM, Stefan Weigand wrote:
Not really.
If I check this box, the system Apache 1.3 will be started as in
On Mar 22, 2004, at 7:26 PM, Guido Lorenz wrote:
4. Nevertheless, removing the package with "dpkg --remove
--force-depends postgresql-python-py22", gives:
dpkg: error processing postgresql-python-py22 (--remove):
Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
reinstall it before attemp
On Mar 21, 2004, at 11:26 AM, David Rocamora wrote:
On Mar 20, 2004, at 11:31 PM, Mark Moorcroft wrote:
Observation:
With XDarwin/Gnome running full screen and in the background I find
that my system load is only about .15, but my Powerbook is burning
hot.
Your system load (as displayed by somet
15 matches
Mail list logo
