Hello everybody!
I am still fighting with getting my fink installation up to date
since I switched to 10.4.
When I try to update glib2 I get this error:
...
PASS: unicode-encoding
PASS: utf8-validate
..
Hi!
I tried to install glui in Fink 0.8.0 for Tiger and encountered the following
error.
sudo fink install glui
Information about 4635 packages read in 5 seconds.
The following package will be installed or updated:
glui
The following additional package will be installed:
glui-shlibs
Do you
* Christian Ebert on Mon, Jul 11, 2005:
receiving file list ... done
./
10.3/
10.3/VERSION
and that's it. Normally a saw all sections echoed.
Seems to working again. This time apparently /all/ descriptions
were downloaded.
c
--
_B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! ---
* Christoph Ewering on Tue, Jul 12, 2005:
I am still fighting with getting my fink installation up to date
since I switched to 10.4.
When I try to update glib2 I get this error:
This happens in 10.3 too. But only on German machines. I haven't
heard of a clean workaround so you can try my
Trying to update-all on 10.3.9 unstable and up to date
apart from this (and libbonobo2, gonme-keyring in the queue
behind it), and just failed to compile orbit2-2.12.2-1. The
fail is rather odd, here is the last chunk of output:
- begin build output excerpt -
Making all in test
(rm
Hi,
After I upgraded to Tiger, I noticed that indexing with fink is
suddenly very slow. It now takes several minutes instead of 10-20
seconds on 10.3.9. Maybe this is related to Spotlight? Is there
anyway I can speed this up?
thanks,
- Koen.
On Jul 12, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
After I upgraded to Tiger, I noticed that indexing with fink is
suddenly very slow. It now takes several minutes instead of 10-20
seconds on 10.3.9. Maybe this is related to Spotlight? Is there
anyway I can speed this up?
If you
While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following error:
...
g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71
-I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g -O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21
chol.cc -o chol.o
In file included from chol.cc:32:
/sw/include/utils.h:2:10:
On 12 Jul 2005, at 19:42, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following
error:
...
g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/
octave-2.1.71 -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g -
O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 chol.cc -o
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following error:...g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71 -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g -O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 chol.cc -o chol.oIn file
Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing
openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using
XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well.
It does take a very large amount of disk space to build though. I
probably didn't catch the peak disk space used, but near
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:41:25PM -0400, Kevin Horton wrote:
Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing
openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using
XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well.
SNIP
The build took over 18 hrs on a G4 Dual 1.42, so this
Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install of
OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org? As far as
I can see from their web site, they have the latest and greatest versions
built for OS X, and I would think that they'd have installers for new
On 07/12/05 at 18:05, Christopher Bort wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install
of OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org?
As far as I can see from their web site, they have the latest and
greatest versions built for OS X, and I
Richard Cobbe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:41:25PM -0400, Kevin Horton wrote:
Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing
openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using
XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well.
SNIP
The build took over 18
On 12 Jul 2005, at 21:05, Christopher Bort wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install of
OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org?
As far as
I can see from their web site, they have the latest and greatest
versions
built for OS X, and
--
Package manager version: 0.24.7
Distribution version: 0.7.2.rsync
Mac OS X version: 10.3.9
December 2002 Developer Tools or later
gcc version: 3.3
make version: 3.79
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
Previously reported but no solution found (or suggested).
No Error is reported prior to
I've been having a rather strange problem using mftrace from Fink, I get
the following error when I attempt to generate a Type1 font from my
METAFONT source. I've also tested this on Linux with mftrace 1.1.9 and
the exact same version of FontForge, but it works just fine. Does
anyone have
Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing
openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using
XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well.
It does take a very large amount of disk space to build though. I
probably didn't catch the peak disk space used, but near
Hi all,
a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again, and
it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded. However, I
can't find an amarok executable anywhere on my system!I know the
executable is called 'amarok' on my Linux system, but I can't find it
on
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:15 PM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again,
and it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded.
However, I can't find an amarok executable anywhere on my
system!I know the executable is called 'amarok'
On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:02 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:15 PM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again,
and it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded.
However, I can't find an amarok executable anywhere on
On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
there isn't anything in /sw/bin, which I expected, since a 'which
amarok' returned nothing, and a 'find / -name amarok' found only
the directory in that list above.
Something clearly went wrong during the build and/or install phase.
Try
I still can't get it to build on Tiger (now 10.4.2) with XCode 2.1. I
am fairly convinced that part of the problem is this mozilla patch..
diff -ur mozilla.bak/dist/private/nss/oiddata.h mozilla/dist/private/
nss/oiddata.h
--- mozilla.bak/security/nss/lib/pki1/oiddata.h2002-01-03
On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
there isn't anything in /sw/bin, which I expected, since a 'which
amarok' returned nothing, and a 'find / -name amarok' found only
the directory in that list above.
Something
25 matches
Mail list logo
