[Fink-users] glui_error

Hi! I tried to install glui in Fink 0.8.0 for Tiger and encountered the following error. sudo fink install glui Information about 4635 packages read in 5 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: glui The following additional package will be installed: glui-shlibs Do you wan

[Fink-users] Re: rsync problem

* Christian Ebert on Mon, Jul 11, 2005: > receiving file list ... done > ./ > 10.3/ > 10.3/VERSION > > and that's it. Normally a saw all sections echoed. Seems to working again. This time apparently /all/ descriptions were downloaded. c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->>

[Fink-users] Re: build glib2 failed: ./run-markup-tests.sh: line 27: 4683 Bus error

* Christoph Ewering on Tue, Jul 12, 2005: > I am still fighting with getting my fink installation up to date > since I switched to 10.4. > When I try to update glib2 I get this error: This happens in 10.3 too. But only on German machines. I haven't heard of a clean workaround so you can try my d

[Fink-users] orbit2-2.12.2-1 on 10.3.9 fails to compile

Trying to update-all on 10.3.9 unstable and up to date apart from this (and libbonobo2, gonme-keyring in the queue behind it), and just failed to compile orbit2-2.12.2-1. The fail is rather odd, here is the last chunk of output: - begin build output excerpt - Making all in test (rm -

[Fink-users] fink index slow on tiger?

Hi, After I upgraded to Tiger, I noticed that indexing with fink is suddenly very slow. It now takes several minutes instead of 10-20 seconds on 10.3.9. Maybe this is related to Spotlight? Is there anyway I can speed this up? thanks, - Koen. --

Re: [Fink-users] fink index slow on tiger?

On Jul 12, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote: After I upgraded to Tiger, I noticed that indexing with fink is suddenly very slow. It now takes several minutes instead of 10-20 seconds on 10.3.9. Maybe this is related to Spotlight? Is there anyway I can speed this up? If you used

[Fink-users] octave-forge-2005.06.13-1 failed

While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following error: ... g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71 -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g -O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 chol.cc -o chol.o In file included from chol.cc:32: /sw/include/utils.h:2:10:

Re: [Fink-users] octave-forge-2005.06.13-1 failed

On 12 Jul 2005, at 19:42, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following error: ... g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/ octave-2.1.71 -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g - O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 chol.cc -o chol.o

Re: [Fink-users] octave-forge-2005.06.13-1 failed

On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:While updating to octave-forge-2005.06.13-1, I got the following error:...g++-3.3 -c -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71 -I/sw/include/octave-2.1.71/octave -I/sw/include -g -O2 -DHAVE_OCTAVE_21 chol.cc -o chol.oIn file inc

Re: [Fink-users] octave-forge-2005.06.13-1 failed

On 2005-07-12, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote: > BuildConflicts: libcdparanoia0-dev > in the info file. Done. Thanks for doing the hard work for me. :-) crh --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening Ju

Re: [Fink-users] fink index slow on tiger?

On Jul 12, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: If you used to use stable, but now use unstable, that might explain the slow-down. Otherwise I'm not sure. It's fine now - maybe the initial indexing was slow, but after that it only looks at changes (?) cheers, - Koen. -

[Fink-users] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success, available binary installer

Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well. It does take a very large amount of disk space to build though. I probably didn't catch the peak disk space used, but near the

[Fink-users] parallel builds (was: Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success)

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:41:25PM -0400, Kevin Horton wrote: > Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing > openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using > XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well. > The build took over 18 hrs on a G4 Dual 1.42, so this isn'

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success, available binary installer

Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install of OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org? As far as I can see from their web site, they have the latest and greatest versions built for OS X, and I would think that they'd have installers for new versions

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success, available binary installer

On 07/12/05 at 18:05, Christopher Bort wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install > of OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org? > As far as I can see from their web site, they have the latest and > greatest versions built for OS X, and I w

Re: [Fink-users] parallel builds

Richard Cobbe wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:41:25PM -0400, Kevin Horton wrote: Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well. The build took over 18 hrs on

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success, available binary installer

On 12 Jul 2005, at 21:05, Christopher Bort wrote: Just out of curiosity, what's the advantage of using a Fink install of OpenOffice.org over the 'official' installer from openoffice.org? As far as I can see from their web site, they have the latest and greatest versions built for OS X, and

[Fink-users] compile error xfig-3.2.5-3

-- Package manager version: 0.24.7 Distribution version: 0.7.2.rsync Mac OS X version: 10.3.9 December 2002 Developer Tools or later gcc version: 3.3 make version: 3.79 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander Previously reported but no solution found (or suggested). No "Error" is reported prior to

[Fink-users] mftrace not working?

I've been having a rather strange problem using mftrace from Fink, I get the following error when I attempt to generate a Type1 font from my METAFONT source. I've also tested this on Linux with mftrace 1.1.9 and the exact same version of FontForge, but it works just fine. Does anyone have any

[Fink-users] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success, available binary installer

Thank you very much to the Todai Fink Team for bringing openoffice.org to Fink. I successfully built it on Tiger, using XCode 2.0, and it seems to work very well. It does take a very large amount of disk space to build though. I probably didn't catch the peak disk space used, but near the

[Fink-users] amarok?

Hi all, a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again, and it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded. However, I can't find an amarok executable anywhere on my system!I know the executable is called 'amarok' on my Linux system, but I can't find it on m

Re: [Fink-users] amarok?

On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:15 PM, Kevin Burnett wrote: a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again, and it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded. However, I can't find an amarok executable anywhere on my system!I know the executable is called 'amarok' on

Re: [Fink-users] amarok?

On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:02 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:15 PM, Kevin Burnett wrote: a few weeks later now, I tried to build and install amarok again, and it succeeded! Or at least Fink says that it succeeded. However, I can't find an amarok executable anywhere on

Re: [Fink-users] amarok?

On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote: there isn't anything in /sw/bin, which I expected, since a 'which amarok' returned nothing, and a 'find / -name amarok' found only the directory in that list above. Something clearly went wrong during the build and/or install phase. Try

Re: [Fink-users] Openoffice.org-1.9m113-50 success

I still can't get it to build on Tiger (now 10.4.2) with XCode 2.1. I am fairly convinced that part of the problem is this mozilla patch.. diff -ur mozilla.bak/dist/private/nss/oiddata.h mozilla/dist/private/ nss/oiddata.h --- mozilla.bak/security/nss/lib/pki1/oiddata.h2002-01-03 21:22

Re: [Fink-users] amarok?

On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: On Jul 13, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote: there isn't anything in /sw/bin, which I expected, since a 'which amarok' returned nothing, and a 'find / -name amarok' found only the directory in that list above. Something cle