Re: [Fink-users] Error compiling libmng2-1.0.9-10

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:05:34PM +0100, Pascal Lamboley wrote: Mac G5 runnig Mac OS X 10.4.5 (same problem on a G4 also running 10.4.5) fink --version Package manager version: 0.24.12 [libmng2-1.0.9-10: all claimed to be okay until...] /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc

[Fink-users] Annoying warnings with gcc4-2:4.1.0-1 on OSX 10.3

2006-03-02 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
This has already be the subject of a thread end of August 2005: on OSX 10.3 at least gfortran yields a lot of (harmless) warnings: ... symbol _cacoshf used from dynamic library /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(complex.o) not from earlier dynamic library /usr/lib/libmx.A.dylib(single module) ... or ...

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Huw Davies wrote: I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing this problem or is it something I've managed to do to myself?

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread rjansen
> Huw Davies wrote: >> I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then >> 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one >> of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing >> this problem or is it something I've managed to do to

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [] rsync: delete_one: unlink "/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/libpolyxmass4.patch" failed: Unknown error: 0 (0) rsync: delete_one: unlink "/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/libpolyxmass4.info" failed: Invalid argument (22) rsync:

[Fink-users] Build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
PowerPC using XCode 2.2.1 and associated compilers. JDK 1.5 is installed. The context for the failure is as follows: Making: ../../unxmacxp.pro/lib/iconstructors.uno.lib no ImportLibs on Mac and *ix - echo ../../unxmacxp.pro/lib ../../unxmacxp.pro/lib /sw/bin/cp -p /sw/src/fink.build

[Fink-users] Install tex4ht - incompatible with system-tetex?

2006-03-02 Thread Matthew Leingang
Hello, I'm trying to install the tex4ht package. When doing so, fink wants to install libkpathsea4. Okay by me, except system-tetex has already linked /sw/fink/libkpathsea.a to something in /usr/local. Here's the log: /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/libkpathsea4_3.0-2_

Re: [Fink-users] Install tex4ht - incompatible with system-tetex?

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/2/06, Matthew Leingang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install the tex4ht package. When doing so, fink wants to > install libkpathsea4. Okay by me, except system-tetex has already linked > /sw/fink/libkpathsea.a to something in /usr/local. > > Here's the log: > > >

[Fink-users] Re: Build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
I should have added that this was using the 10.4 tree rather than 10.4-transitional. Sorry about that. On 3/2/06, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PowerPC using XCode 2.2.1 and associated compilers. > JDK 1.5 is installed. > > The context for the failure is as follows: > > Making:

[Fink-users] Compiling failing for enblend-2.5-22

2006-03-02 Thread William
enblend-2.5-22 is failing at compile time with the following errors: make[3]: *** [enblend-enblend.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Removing build lock... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling failing for enblend-2.5-22

2006-03-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
William wrote: > There are a whole lot of "assemble.h:201: error:" lines before that which I > could post if it'd be helpful. But there are a lot. yes, those are the bits that matter. :) Feel free to send me the full log in private e-mail, no need to send it to the list. -- Benjamin Reed a.k

Re: [Fink-users] Install tex4ht - incompatible with system-tetex?

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Matthew Leingang wrote: [] Do I need an actual teTeX package rather than system-tetex? Or should I try to install my own tex4ht? Right now, the Fink tex4ht package won't work with system-tetex. I should probably put a Conflicts: system-tetex inside. It is not only the requirement of libkpath

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Christopher Bort
On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote: > Huw Davies wrote: > > I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then > > 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one > > of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing > > t

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote: > > > Huw Davies wrote: > > > I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then > > > 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one > > > of the compone

Re: [Fink-users] Install tex4ht - incompatible with system-tetex?

2006-03-02 Thread Matthew Leingang
Thanks for the tip, Martin. The teTeX I have in /usr/local came from I-Installer, so I updated that and added the tex4ht support. Works great. --Matt On 3/2/06 11:04 AM, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Leingang wrote: > [] >> Do I need an actual teTeX package rather tha

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote: Huw Davies wrote: I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one of the

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
I have had selfupdate work on run 10.4.5 machine, and fail on another. So it will keep working till there is a delete needed. Is there something that can be done manually to delete the necessary files so selfupdate will work? -Roy M. At 9:31 PM +0100 3/2/06, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexand

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> > >>> Huw Davies wrote: > I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then >

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Roy Mendelssohn wrote: I have had selfupdate work on run 10.4.5 machine, and fail on another. So it will keep working till there is a delete needed. Is there something that can be done manually to delete the necessary files so selfupdate will work? Well, the error messages mention the file

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Djun Kim
On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It could also be that there was nothing to delete. In this case it would run without problem even on Tiger. -- Maertin

[Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Djun Kim wrote: On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It could also be that there was nothing to delete. In this case it would run without problem even on Tige

[Fink-users] KDE 3.5.1-21 not working after clean install

2006-03-02 Thread Doug Wade
Ever since I switched from Apple's X11 to Xorg 6.8.2-35 my install of KDE has been broken. Fiddled around with it a bit but since it was not that important gave up. However finally with the new version of bundle-kde-ssl 3.5.1-21 I decided to do a force remove of all its packages and reinstall

Re: [Fink-users] Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/2/06, Djun Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > > On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It > >> could > >> also be that there was nothing to delete.

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.5.1-21 not working after clean install

2006-03-02 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 3/2/06, Doug Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ever since I switched from Apple's X11 to Xorg 6.8.2-35 my install of > KDE has been broken. > Fiddled around with it a bit but since it was not that important gave > up. > However finally with the new version of bundle-kde-ssl 3.5.1-21 I > decided

[Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Mike Zulauf
Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I wasn't using the added capability within my own rsync scripts, so the fink version should be

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

2006-03-02 Thread Kevin Horton
I get what looks like the exact same error trying to build on 10.4- transitional. Kevin Horton On 2 Mar 2006, at 10:43, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: I should have added that this was using the 10.4 tree rather than 10.4-transitional. Sorry about that. On 3/2/06, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Robert T Wyatt wrote: [] Was there ever a fix implemented for the iTunes 7.0.4 problem on Panther? It's a different subject, but yes, there was (assuming you mean QuickTime 7.0.4; if you really mean iTunes, then please disregard this message). I haven't seen it published, and I don't know if

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Mike Zulauf wrote: Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I wasn't using the added capability within my own rsync scripts, so the fink ve

[Fink-users] zsh-4.3.2 checksum (in 10.4-transitional)

2006-03-02 Thread Robert T Wyatt
I think the checksum might need to be updated for zsh-4.3.2: curl -f -L -O http://mirrors.theonlinerecordstore.com/zsh/zsh-4.3.2.tar.bz2 % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Mike Zulauf
Martin Costabel wrote: Mike Zulauf wrote: Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I wasn't using the added capability within my own rsyn

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Latest security update and rsync

2006-03-02 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:45:43PM -0800, Mike Zulauf wrote: > > Presumably, shouldn't the source be available for Apple's version of > rsync? It is GPL'd after all. It's probably beyond my skills to > obtain the code and build a fink package, but I'd assume it could be > done. In that wa