On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:45:43PM -0800, Mike Zulauf wrote:
>
> Presumably, shouldn't the source be available for Apple's version of
> rsync? It is GPL'd after all. It's probably beyond my skills to
> obtain the code and build a fink package, but I'd assume it could be
> done. In that wa
Martin Costabel wrote:
Mike Zulauf wrote:
Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this
instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's
additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I
wasn't
using the added capability within my own rsyn
I think the checksum might need to be updated for zsh-4.3.2:
curl -f -L -O http://mirrors.theonlinerecordstore.com/zsh/zsh-4.3.2.tar.bz2
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft
Speed
Mike Zulauf wrote:
Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this
instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's
additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I wasn't
using the added capability within my own rsync scripts, so the fink
ve
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
[]
Was there ever a fix implemented for the iTunes 7.0.4 problem on Panther?
It's a different subject, but yes, there was (assuming you mean
QuickTime 7.0.4; if you really mean iTunes, then please disregard this
message). I haven't seen it published, and I don't know if
I get what looks like the exact same error trying to build on 10.4-
transitional.
Kevin Horton
On 2 Mar 2006, at 10:43, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
I should have added that this was using the 10.4 tree rather than
10.4-transitional. Sorry about that.
On 3/2/06, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PR
Is there any overwhelming reason not to use fink's rsync in this
instance? It's an older version, and it doesn't implement Apple's
additions (I think), but it appears to be working fine for me. I
wasn't using the added capability within my own rsync scripts, so the
fink version should be
On 3/2/06, Doug Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ever since I switched from Apple's X11 to Xorg 6.8.2-35 my install of
> KDE has been broken.
> Fiddled around with it a bit but since it was not that important gave
> up.
> However finally with the new version of bundle-kde-ssl 3.5.1-21 I
> decided
On 3/2/06, Djun Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>
> > On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It
> >> could
> >> also be that there was nothing to delete.
Ever since I switched from Apple's X11 to Xorg 6.8.2-35 my install of
KDE has been broken.
Fiddled around with it a bit but since it was not that important gave
up.
However finally with the new version of bundle-kde-ssl 3.5.1-21 I
decided to do a force remove of all its packages and reinstall
Djun Kim wrote:
On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It could
also be that there was nothing to delete. In this case it would run
without problem even on Tige
On 2-Mar-2006, at 12:51 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It
could
also be that there was nothing to delete. In this case it would run
without problem even on Tiger.
--
Maertin
Roy Mendelssohn wrote:
I have had selfupdate work on run 10.4.5 machine, and fail on another.
So it will keep working till there is a delete needed. Is there
something that can be done manually to delete the necessary files so
selfupdate will work?
Well, the error messages mention the file
On 3/2/06, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Huw Davies wrote:
> I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
>
I have had selfupdate work on run 10.4.5 machine, and fail on
another. So it will keep working till there is a delete needed. Is
there something that can be done manually to delete the necessary
files so selfupdate will work?
-Roy M.
At 9:31 PM +0100 3/2/06, Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexand
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote:
Huw Davies wrote:
I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one
of the
Thanks for the tip, Martin. The teTeX I have in /usr/local came from
I-Installer, so I updated that and added the tex4ht support. Works great.
--Matt
On 3/2/06 11:04 AM, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Leingang wrote:
> []
>> Do I need an actual teTeX package rather tha
On 3/2/06, Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> > Huw Davies wrote:
> > > I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
> > > 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one
> > > of the compone
On 03/02/06 at 00:38, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
> > I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
> > 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one
> > of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing
> > t
Matthew Leingang wrote:
[]
Do I need an actual teTeX package rather than system-tetex? Or should I try
to install my own tex4ht?
Right now, the Fink tex4ht package won't work with system-tetex. I
should probably put a Conflicts: system-tetex inside. It is not only the
requirement of libkpath
William wrote:
> There are a whole lot of "assemble.h:201: error:" lines before that which I
> could post if it'd be helpful. But there are a lot.
yes, those are the bits that matter. :)
Feel free to send me the full log in private e-mail, no need to send it
to the list.
--
Benjamin Reed a.k
enblend-2.5-22 is failing at compile time with the following errors:
make[3]: *** [enblend-enblend.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r
I should have added that this was using the 10.4 tree rather than
10.4-transitional. Sorry about that.
On 3/2/06, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PowerPC using XCode 2.2.1 and associated compilers.
> JDK 1.5 is installed.
>
> The context for the failure is as follows:
>
> Making:
On 3/2/06, Matthew Leingang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to install the tex4ht package. When doing so, fink wants to
> install libkpathsea4. Okay by me, except system-tetex has already linked
> /sw/fink/libkpathsea.a to something in /usr/local.
>
> Here's the log:
>
>
>
Hello,
I'm trying to install the tex4ht package. When doing so, fink wants to
install libkpathsea4. Okay by me, except system-tetex has already linked
/sw/fink/libkpathsea.a to something in /usr/local.
Here's the log:
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
/sw/var/cache/apt/archives/libkpathsea4_3.0-2_
PowerPC using XCode 2.2.1 and associated compilers.
JDK 1.5 is installed.
The context for the failure is as follows:
Making: ../../unxmacxp.pro/lib/iconstructors.uno.lib
no ImportLibs on Mac and *ix
-
echo ../../unxmacxp.pro/lib
../../unxmacxp.pro/lib
/sw/bin/cp -p
/sw/src/fink.build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
rsync: delete_one: unlink
"/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/libpolyxmass4.patch"
failed: Unknown error: 0 (0)
rsync: delete_one: unlink
"/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/libpolyxmass4.info"
failed: Invalid argument (22)
rsync:
> Huw Davies wrote:
>> I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
>> 'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one
>> of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing
>> this problem or is it something I've managed to do to
Huw Davies wrote:
I've just applied the latest Mac OS-X security update and since then
'fink selfupdate' has been failing at the rsync phase. Now rsync is one
of the components changed in the security update. Is anyone else seeing
this problem or is it something I've managed to do to myself?
This has already be the subject of a thread end of August 2005:
on OSX 10.3 at least gfortran yields a lot of (harmless) warnings:
...
symbol _cacoshf used from dynamic library /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(complex.o)
not from earlier dynamic library /usr/lib/libmx.A.dylib(single module)
...
or
...
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:05:34PM +0100, Pascal Lamboley wrote:
Mac G5 runnig Mac OS X 10.4.5 (same problem on a G4 also running 10.4.5)
fink --version
Package manager version: 0.24.12
[libmng2-1.0.9-10: all claimed to be okay until...]
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc
31 matches
Mail list logo
