i didn't see rysnc on the software update notes but according to
macfixit.com it *was* part of the security update.
i am running 10.3.9 but not sure if i should apply the update...
matt.
I don't know, I have no Panther with security update to test. It could
also be that there was nothing
Matthew Parry schrieb:
i didn't see rysnc on the software update notes but according to
macfixit.com it *was* part of the security update.
Well, the original advisory by Apple has this to say:
rsync
CVE-ID: CVE-2005-3712
Available for: Mac OS X v10.4.5, Mac OS X Server v10.4.5
Impact:
Hi everyone, maybe someone will be help me out here and answer my question. Ok
it's not fink related but it's on the subject of rsync. :}
I'm no expert here, but i do keep hearing that Apple's release of rsync doesn't
work (finks?) and now i'm hearing that Apple's latest security patches are
Nils Holland wrote:
Matthew Parry schrieb:
i didn't see rysnc on the software update notes but according to
macfixit.com it *was* part of the security update.
Well, the original advisory by Apple has this to say:
rsync
CVE-ID: CVE-2005-3712
Available for: Mac OS X v10.4.5, Mac OS X
On 3/3/06, Gregory, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone, maybe someone will be help me out here and answer my question.
Ok it's not fink related but it's on the subject of rsync. :}
I'm no expert here, but i do keep hearing that Apple's release of rsync
doesn't work (finks?) and now
To clarify the situation, I'll quote what Apple said about the update
(http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303382)
rsync
CVE-ID: CVE-2005-3712
Available for: Mac OS X v10.4.5, Mac OS X Server v10.4.5
Impact: Authenticated users may cause an rsync server to crash or
execute
On 3/3/06, Bob Portmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are the GNU coreutils and binutils packages not included in Fink?
These seem like pretty basic stuff that I imagine lots of people would
want (since many of the gnu commands are much nicer than the BSD ones
that come with Darwin). Do they
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 3/3/06, Bob Portmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are the GNU coreutils and binutils packages not included in Fink?
These seem like pretty basic stuff that I imagine lots of people would
want (since many of the gnu commands are much nicer than
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
There were problems with coreutils historically.
If you'd like to make (working) Fink packages for them, I'm sure folks
would appreciate your efforts. :-)
I've got a set of coreutils packages in my experimental tree. They've
just been so untrustworthy in the
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
What the official rsync has that Fink's package lacks (I'm not sure
about your build) is support for resource forks.
Note that some reports have indicated that resource fork support in
Apple's rsync is actually broken.
Dave
PGP.sig
I am leaving this to the libtool gurus. I tried off-list to find
differences between Pascal's configuration where this breaks and mine
where it works. Completely without success, there is no visible
difference. I am giving up.
Pascal Lamboley wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install libmng2 needed
Martin Costabel wrote:
I am leaving this to the libtool gurus. I tried off-list to find
differences between Pascal's configuration where this breaks and mine
where it works. Completely without success, there is no visible
difference. I am giving up.
The configure file that is generated here
Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
There were problems with coreutils historically.
If you'd like to make (working) Fink packages for them, I'm sure folks
would appreciate your efforts. :-)
I've got a set of coreutils packages in my experimental tree.
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[]
I'm not sure why, but he's getting the ltmain.sh from /usr/share/libtool
when he runs glibtoolize, he's properly getting
/sw/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 in configure though. Does he have
/sw/bin/glibtoolize?
I think so, although I didn't ask this specifically. He has
14 matches
Mail list logo
