On 7/6/14, 9:43 PM, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.2014 um 21:26 schrieb fink-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net:
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 12:15:56 -0700
From: Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] fink install lazarus-aqua (1.2.4.1)
On Jul 3, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 7/3/14, 7:59 AM, Geoffrey Smith wrote:
Hello all -
I have had this strange problem for a long time now and still have not been
able to solve it - I am hoping for any help.
I have two systems very
Hi,
Thanks for the report. The problem was that the package was checking the
/usr/bin/gcc build number, and this doesn't exist when /usr/bin/gcc is
clang.
A version which should build for you on 10.8 (it worked for me on 10.9)
should be available shortly via selfupdate. It's the same
Geoffrey,
How did you install fink on these machines? Was it done using the
recommended clean bootstrap on either MacOS X 10.7 or 10.8 or did you do
the unsupported upgrade from x86_64 10.6 fink? If you did the latter, I
would definitely try moving aside your fink %p fink directory and do
Jack -
Thanks for the suggestions. I believe I did the clean bootstrap, but I have
installed fink so many times on so many different machines I honestly don't
remember how it was installed on these two machines. They have been my primary
work machines since 2008, so there could definitely be
Martin, and all,
Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
Fang
On 6/07/14 01:21, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Jul 5, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Kevin Horton khorto...@gmail.com
[]
In file included from
On 8/07/14 00:10, David Fang wrote:
Martin, and all,
Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
In the sources of geda-gaf, this seems the only place that needs fixing.
With the patch to scheme_object.c,
Charles,
Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet?
Fang
On 8/07/14 00:10, David Fang wrote:
Martin, and all,
Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
In the sources of geda-gaf, this seems the only
Christian,
thanks! i've never used pcre. my fingers are programmed more like
regex, but that will work in a pinch. (and, it would still be nice to
have \ and \ work.)
cheers, Greg
--
Open source business process
