Re: [Fink-users] darwinports

2002-09-29 Thread Charlie Allom
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:55:43AM -0400, Daniel E. White wrote: At 9:44 AM -0400 9/27/02, Koen van der Drift wrote: Just read on MacSlash (http://www.macslash.org/articles/02/09/27/0228210.shtml) about a new (?) initiative to port *NIX apps to MacOSX. Is this a threat for Fink, or just

Re: [Fink-users] darwinports

2002-09-29 Thread Charlie Allom
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: Change for the sake of change? Well IMO I've seen other package management systems from Hubbard flourish (which of course has to do with the users also - fink people are a good breed) .. Promises of great advances just around

Re: [Fink-users] How about a new approach?

2002-09-26 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 04:16:24AM -0400, Joel Hacker wrote: Just had an idea. It's rare, but it does happen occasionally. Obviously. The stated goal of the fink project is to bring Linux software to Mac OS X, right? No. Opinions? Comments? Rude remarks? Anyone?

Re: [Fink-users] How about a new approach?

2002-09-26 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:08:52AM -0400, Joel Hacker wrote: On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 08:42 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Here's another question: what fraction of all of the open source applications out there have been ported to run on a Mac under Linux? To the best of my

Re: [Fink-users] aspell + jag?

2002-08-27 Thread Charlie Allom
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:44:10AM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: Looks like aspell does not yet compile on gcc3/jaguar due to C++ problems. pspell does though, so i added it to the 10.2 tree (with a version bump) Thanks Ben. Sorry for not being more helpful Jeff. What is the 10.2 tree? can I

Re: [Fink-users] aspell + jag?

2002-08-27 Thread Charlie Allom
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:44:10AM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: Looks like aspell does not yet compile on gcc3/jaguar due to C++ problems. pspell does though, so i added it to the 10.2 tree (with a version bump) Actually on second thought let's abandon the whole thing and go with GNU Aspell :)

[Fink-users] mutt + nntp + compressed folders patch

2002-08-03 Thread Charlie Allom
Hi, I have modified the mutt-1.4i distribution (non-ssl) with 2 patches for reading usenet with mutt (works quite well) and having compressed folders. Where should I send these for inclusion with the fink dist? C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rubberduck.com/yeled/pgp.txt

[Fink-users] [OT] little white square with XDarwin?

2002-07-11 Thread Charlie Allom
OTish.. Does anyone else have little white square in the bottom right of their screen when they have XDarwin at the forefront? Or is this an OroborOSX thing. I can't click on it. C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://eatyourpets.com/~yeled/pgp.txt FC8B 8727 8E82 5242 358C 8FC0 AA26 43C2 14AA

Re: [Fink-users] [OT] little white square with XDarwin?

2002-07-11 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:49:44PM +0200, Oscar Erlandsson wrote: Now I've confirmed that it is in fact autocutsel that produces the little square. Why, I have no idea. But it disappeared when I killed autocutsel, and it came back as soon as I restarted it. Thanks Oscar. It is autocutsel.

Re: [Fink-users] nmh broken?

2002-06-27 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 04:44:51PM +1000, Charlie Allom wrote: Hi, getting lots and lots of warnings when compiling nmh, then it finally dies at: And now it works! 3rd time lucky - nothing changed! Argh I hate computers on Thursdays. C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://eatyourpets.com

Re: [Fink-users] Can I get rid of extra 'baggage' in /sw/src?

2002-05-30 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:04:12PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: (is this in the FAQ? perhaps it should be?) Likewise, you can delete all *.deb files in your /sw heirarchy without ill effect, other than possibly needing to rebuild things later. They don't affect anything at runtime. In

Re: [Fink-users] Can I get rid of extra 'baggage' in /sw/src?

2002-05-30 Thread Charlie Allom
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:45:48PM +1000, Charlie Allom wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:04:12PM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: (is this in the FAQ? perhaps it should be?) Likewise, you can delete all *.deb files in your /sw heirarchy without ill effect, other than possibly needing

Re: [Fink-users] selfupdate-cvs is trying to su to no one?

2002-05-22 Thread Charlie Allom
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:46:10AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: You are correct. I found a way to force fink to reprompt for a username when doing a selfupdate-cvs which isn't too horrible 1) move /sw/fink/CVS out of the way. Thanks Alexander. I wonder what fink is sending to tcsh to

Re: [Fink-users] selfupdate-cvs is trying to su to no one?

2002-05-21 Thread Charlie Allom
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:04:27AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: Have you tried doing 'fink configure' again from your user account? This doesn't set the user for cvs. C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://eatyourpets.com/yeled/pgp.txt FC8B 8727 8E82 5242 358C 8FC0 AA26 43C2 14AA 7941

[Fink-users] selfupdate-cvs is trying to su to no one?

2002-05-20 Thread Charlie Allom
Hi, for some reason fink isn't using a username to su to. Where is this set so I can fix this? Or is it deeper than that? re: perl errors. [newson:~] yeled% fink selfupdate-cvs sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate-cvs Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) at /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/SelfUpdate .pm

[Fink-users] cvs dies

2002-04-29 Thread Charlie Allom
cvs dies on build: 103 yeled@peko[~]% date Tue Apr 30 13:51:23 EST 2002 that's AEST 104 yeled@peko[~]% fink selfupdate-cvs sudo /sw/bin/fink selfupdate-cvs [.. this works ..] 105 yeled@peko[~]% fink update-all sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all Reading package info... Information about 993 packages

[Fink-users] nethack now uses gnome? feh!

2002-03-29 Thread Charlie Allom
Did fink nethack always use gnome in x11? Should I make a nethack-nox? C. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rubberduck.com/pgp.txt F848 3B10 D181 E5EC 84CD 9CA2 7686 6210 FB54 66D1 ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-users] mutt and color

2002-03-27 Thread Charlie Allom
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:49:29AM -0600, Rich Ramos wrote: Does anyone have color working with the current version of mutt from the binary dist? mutt 1.2.5i-2 I would not recommend that version mutt, it has some security problems. 1.3.27i is very good.

[Fink-users] everybuddy fails to compile

2002-02-22 Thread Charlie Allom
Hi, anyone get everybudy to compile? -DPACKAGE=\everybuddy\ -DVERSION=\0.2.0\ -DUNIX=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_WAIT_H=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_ICONV_H=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void -DHAVE_STRFTIME=1 -DHAVE_SOCKET=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRSTR=1 -DHAVE_ATEXIT=1

Re: [Fink-users] Windowmaker install failed

2002-02-18 Thread Charlie Allom
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:42:00PM -0800, Justin C. Walker wrote: windowmaker-0.80.0-1/sw/share/doc/windowmaker bad command-line parameter -d Usage: install switch Where switches are: -s --quiet make silent build -h --help show this message ### install failed, exit code 1

Re: [Fink-users] New sw versions and curl

2002-02-14 Thread Charlie Allom
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:41:33AM +0100, Joseph Bauer wrote: why you don't use wget for downloading the files? I didn't see anything I'd love an option for fink to use wget anyway, as I understand wget much more easily than curl output. Maybe there is something I'm missing in fink.conf?