Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-09-14 Thread Robert Wyatt
Corey Halpin wrote: On 2009-09-07, Alexander Hansen wrote: I believe this particular part of the error was independent of the issue with lablgl. It looks like the patch script from http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30128.html never got into the packaging.

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-09-14 Thread Robert Wyatt
Robert Wyatt wrote: Corey Halpin wrote: On 2009-09-07, Alexander Hansen wrote: I believe this particular part of the error was independent of the issue with lablgl. It looks like the patch script from http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30128.html never

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-09-13 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2009-09-07, Alexander Hansen wrote: I believe this particular part of the error was independent of the issue with lablgl. It looks like the patch script from http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30128.html never got into the packaging. I get the same error

[Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-09-07 Thread Gyesik Lee
Dear fink user, I am posting a question which was already dealt with in this mailing list. The question seems to be answered in http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30132.html but, it did not work for me. I am using PowerBook G4, OS 10.4.11, Tiger, and trying to

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-09-07 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gyesik Lee wrote: Dear fink user, I am posting a question which was already dealt with in this mailing list. The question seems to be answered in http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30132.html but, it did not work

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-30 Thread Peter Stirling
Ubuntu apt (I've not used debian but ubuntu is a derivative) has post-install hooks. Something that calls 'fink rebuild' on all installed packages that 'apt-cache rdepends' on ocaml would probably be the easiest way to do it 'correctly'. Hmm, I've just checked and fink's apt-cache doesn't support

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-30 Thread Daniel Macks
Also, can't call fink build (or any other mode that may compile or install a .deb) from within PostInst (or any similar .deb script) because risk of deadlocking on dpkg status database or other non-concurrently-usable data files. dan On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:05:00AM +0100, Peter Stirling

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
Mechanically, when we need a hard dependency ( =foo-%v-%r ) such as for maxima on sbcl and, it appears, many packages on ocaml, it seems like the only way to work it through is to: 1) Remove the packages that Depend on the 'tricky' one (foo), and note what got removed. 2) Update foo . 3) Then

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-29 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Jun 2009, at 23:06, Brendan Cully wrote: On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 23:06, Brendan Cully wrote: On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-29 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:13, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jean-François Mertens wrote: including that some deps may have to be updated to a new version. E.g., with current ocaml one needs %v=5.12 for camlp5 (with previous ocaml, %v=5.11 was needed; in fink: %v=5.08). It would be nice if such

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:13, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jean-François Mertens wrote: including that some deps may have to be updated to a new version. E.g., with current ocaml one needs %v=5.12 for camlp5 (with previous ocaml, %v=5.11 was needed; in fink: %v=5.08).

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-29 Thread Brendan Cully
On Monday, 29 June 2009 at 14:50, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 23:06, Brendan Cully wrote: On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above)

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-27 Thread Martin Costabel
Brendan Cully wrote: On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma lablgl.cma \

[Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
OS 10.5.7 Intel Xcode 3.1.3 Building against current/unstable dependency descriptions as of the posting of this message. From the configure phase ... checking for ocamlc... ocamlc ocaml version is 3.11.1 ocaml library path is /sw/lib/ocaml Default install dirs are : /sw/lib/ocaml/lablgtk2 and

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:47:03PM +0200, Alexander Hansen wrote: OS 10.5.7 Intel Xcode 3.1.3 Building against current/unstable dependency descriptions as of the posting of this message. From the configure phase ... checking for pkg-config... /sw/bin/pkg-config checking for GTK+ -

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:01, Daniel Macks wrote: checking lablGL directory... no I get here : checking lablGL directory... +lablGL (have lablgl-x11 installed) GtkGLArea not sure if that's a problem or not (missing (b)dep?) I get there a yes Same error in build phase Could just be a missing

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma lablgl.cma \ -I . lablgtk.cma lablgtkgl.cma lablglade.cma lablgnomecanvas.cma lablgnomeui.cma

Re: [Fink-users] Build error in lablgtk2-2.10.1-102

2009-06-26 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma lablgl.cma \ -I . lablgtk.cma