Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Chris Devers
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Martin Costabel wrote: Justin Hallett wrote: it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Max Horn
At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: Justin Hallett wrote: it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread hysterion
Alexander Hansen wrote: It seems to be working more consistently since I sent the message out (of course). The problem occurs on startup, when it happens. Another shot in the dark: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127186 Macho static build does not launch Although Mach-O uses

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Martin Costabel
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 02:27 , Max Horn wrote: At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote: IMHO it should be done once and for all in /sw/bin/init.{sh|csh}. Ugh, I disagree. That would unlimit it for the whole system. Yes, that's what I am actually proposing. Mozilla is not

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Masanori Sekino
mozilla-0.9.9-2 does unlimit stack in /sw/bin/mozilla, too. On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:16:11 +0100 Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you unlimit stack? This makes it work for me. The new version is supposed to do this automatically, but I think that part doesn't work: It does

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Allen Smith
Whenever I see this with mozilla I try and mv ~/.mozilla ~/.mozilla.safe and restart to see if it comes up. Sometimes the various mozilla builds don't react well to previous cruft in .mozilla. On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It seems to be working more

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-28 Thread Martin Costabel
Masanori Sekino wrote: mozilla-0.9.9-2 does unlimit stack in /sw/bin/mozilla, too. Yes, I see this now. Sorry for not looking before. The reason why I thought it still did not set it was: I started mozilla 2 or 3 times and it crashed each time, with quite different messages in the crash

[Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-27 Thread Alexander Hansen
I rebuilt all of the direct dependencies of mozilla (see my earlier message) and then rebuilt mozilla. It now works intermittently: I either get the 'Illegal instruction' error or the browser window actually opens and seems OK. Has anybody had better success than this? -- Alexander K. Hansen

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-27 Thread Justin Hallett
no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anybody had better success than this? ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst Phone: (780)-408-3094 Fax: (780)-454-3200

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-27 Thread Chris Devers
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Zorro wrote: no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anybody had better success than this? Doesn't seem to be getting a lot of attention I guess no news is good news I guess. I haven't been replying because I don't

Re: [Fink-users] Erraticness with mozilla 0.9.9-2

2002-03-27 Thread Justin Hallett
it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess. I haven't been replying because I don't have