Hi,
mozilla-0.9.9-3 is out. I think this 'illegal instruction' at lanch time is solved.
Please try it and let me know result. if it works fine, I move it to stable.
Thanks,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:43:53 -0500 (EST)
Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rebuilt all of the direct depen
Masanori Sekino wrote:
>
> mozilla-0.9.9-2 does "unlimit stack" in /sw/bin/mozilla, too.
Yes, I see this now. Sorry for not looking before.
The reason why I thought it still did not set it was: I started mozilla
2 or 3 times and it crashed each time, with quite different messages in
the crash
Whenever I see this with mozilla I try and mv ~/.mozilla ~/.mozilla.safe
and restart to see if it comes up. Sometimes the various mozilla builds
don't react well to previous cruft in .mozilla.
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 06:15 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It seems to be working more cons
mozilla-0.9.9-2 does "unlimit stack" in /sw/bin/mozilla, too.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:16:11 +0100
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you "unlimit stack"? This makes it work for me. The new version is
> supposed to do this automatically, but I think that part doesn't work:
>
> It do
On jeudi, mars 28, 2002, at 02:27 , Max Horn wrote:
> At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>
>> IMHO it should be done once and for all in /sw/bin/init.{sh|csh}.
>
> Ugh, I disagree. That would unlimit it for the whole system.
>
Yes, that's what I am actually proposing. Mozilla i
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It seems to be working more consistently since I sent the message out (of
> course). The problem occurs on startup, when it happens.
Another shot in the dark:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127186
"Macho static build does not launch"
Although Mach-O uses
It seems to be working more consistently since I sent the message out (of
course). The problem occurs on startup, when it happens.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-21
>
>Yes I tried that, and no it didn't help.
>
>The problem seems to be something else.
And to bear that out there were 2 posts back on 3-23 (beginners) concerning
the failed compilation of Galeon:
... Wmissing-
declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare -Werror -c mozilla.cpp
mozilla.cpp: I
At 9:16 Uhr +0100 28.03.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>Justin Hallett wrote:
>>
>> it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
>> it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
>> update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Justin Hallett wrote:
> >
> > it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
> > it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
> > update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for
I'v also tried to get mozilla to work with the same results... no matter
what I try to do, I just get a gdk-warning and an illegal instruction.
do you know how I could get any debugging information?
unlimit stack doesn't help at all (except that my memory gets used until
only about 10 Megs of 51
Justin Hallett wrote:
>
> it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
> it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
> update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.
Did you "unlimit stack"? This makes it work for me
it couldn't have unless some builddepends are missing but then you figure
it wouldn't work at all. but I've seen this since the 0.9.9 mozilla
update. 0.9.8 worked no version of revision of 0.9.9 has worked for me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I guess. I haven't been replying because I don't have
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Zorro wrote:
> >no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >Has anybody had better success than this?
>
> Doesn't seem to be getting a lot of attention
> I guess no news is good news
I guess. I haven't been replying becau
>no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Has anybody had better success than this?
Doesn't seem to be getting a lot of attention
I guess no news is good news
Zorro
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PR
no I can't even get the window to open and i get no errors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Has anybody had better success than this?
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E
I rebuilt all of the direct dependencies of mozilla (see my earlier
message) and then rebuilt mozilla. It now works intermittently: I
either get the 'Illegal instruction' error or the browser window actually
opens and seems OK.
Has anybody had better success than this?
--
Alexander K. Hansen
A
17 matches
Mail list logo
