jfm wrote:
Right question: personnally, I didn't get this error when first
rebuilding my pkgs under
10.3 with Apple's X11, but do get it now when re-doing the same with
xfree86-4.3.99.16.
(Didn't have the time to look at it yet.)
From looking at cvs logs, it seems this was introduced into
xfree
I'll see if I can confirm this when I get home--my laptop's on Panther
but I left the power cord at home, and I'm not quite ready to update my
desktop machine yet.
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 01:03 PM, jfm wrote:
On Dec 9, 2003, at 6:47 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Are you using Apple's
For this version of XFree86, you should be safe--there are some
versions that weren't quite specified correctly, and parts of them
could overwrite another X11. That's actually the only thing that can
really happen: all X11's are installed in more or less the same place.
You should be using X
How can I tell if fink is using the right version, though? Is it even
possible for fink to be using Apple's version?
On Dec 9, 2003, at 12:10 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That's the version that works, so that seems OK as far as it goes.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
That's the version that works, so that seems OK as far as it goes.
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 01:19 PM, Carl Youngblood wrote:
Sorry, I believe I forgot to keep my reply on-list. Here it is again.
On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That wouldn't show up in the PATH--
It's possible I may have missed your response to this message,
Alexander. If you already sent a response, would you mind emailing me
it again? I was messing with some mail filters and might have lost it.
Thanks,
Carl
On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:19 AM, Carl Youngblood wrote:
Sorry, I believe I forgo
Sorry, I believe I forgot to keep my reply on-list. Here it is again.
On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That wouldn't show up in the PATH--it gets set up when the build is
run.
You aren't supposed to be able to have Apple's X11 and XFree86
together. What do you get from
On Dec 9, 2003, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That wouldn't show up in the PATH--it gets set up when the build is
run.
You aren't supposed to be able to have Apple's X11 and XFree86
together. What do you get from running
fink list -i xfree86
Information about 1129 packages read in
That wouldn't show up in the PATH--it gets set up when the build is run.
You aren't supposed to be able to have Apple's X11 and XFree86
together. What do you get from running
fink list -i xfree86
(This will answer two questions for me).
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 12:58 PM, Carl Youngblo
On Dec 9, 2003, at 6:47 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Are you using Apple's X11?
Right question: personnally, I didn't get this error when first
rebuilding my pkgs under
10.3 with Apple's X11, but do get it now when re-doing the same with
xfree86-4.3.99.16.
(Didn't have the time to look at it y
I installed fink's version of xfree86, so I assumed that it would use
that. However, from looking at the path (/usr/X11R6/...) it doesn't
look like it's getting its includes from a subdirectory in /sw. Is
there a way I can make sure that my system uses fink's version of X11,
removing apple's
Are you using Apple's X11?
On Tuesday, December 9, 2003, at 12:42 PM, Carl Youngblood wrote:
Hello, I'm wondering if anyone else has run into an error installing
vim. I'm running Panther. I installed fink from source after having
trouble with the binary package. Everything seemed to work fi
Hello, I'm wondering if anyone else has run into an error installing
vim. I'm running Panther. I installed fink from source after having
trouble with the binary package. Everything seemed to work fine.
Anway, when I install vim, it installs all the dependencies fine until
it gets to the ac
13 matches
Mail list logo
