Re: [Fink-users] FEEDBACK REQUEST: cvs-1.12.12 from unstable trees

I've been running it for a month (only with a local repository though) without any problem. Andrea. On Sep 29, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: I'd like anybody who has been using cvs-1.12.12 to send me any positive or negative feedback. I've been using it myself with no inc

[Fink-users] FEEDBACK REQUEST: cvs-1.12.12 from unstable trees

I'd like anybody who has been using cvs-1.12.12 to send me any positive or negative feedback. I've been using it myself with no incidents, but I'd like to get some more data points before I consider moving this to stable. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia Univer

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Well you were right of course! I use PsynX for backing up my hard disk to a firewire external disk, and sure enough it has installed rsync-hfs in both /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin! Hopefully I had the genuine Apple version on an other machine. It is a 1/3 in size and now all is fine with selfupd

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: | Is it really the same binary? It rather looks like it is rsync-hfs, AKA | rsyncX. I wouldn't it put past the authors of that package that they | didn't change the version information. In the older days they even | replaced /usr/

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Paul INDELICATO wrote: [] finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info /bin/cp: finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info/rsrc: No such file or directory fopen: No such file or directory stat finkinfo/w3m-ssl-0.4.1-11.info : No such file or directory [] Could it be that rsync is the problem: rsync version 2.5.5 protocol

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

I have no idea how this mess came upon! I use finkcommander to enable or disable the unstable tree (I have not enabled the unstable crypto). I never touced the fink.conf file by hand. Right now unstable is enabled. Except for the root3.patch I never changed anything myself in the 10.2-gcc3.3 di

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi Paul, Somehow you have a great mix up between stable and unstable packages on your disk (see below). Did you copy the root3.info and roofitcore.info file to the local directory or do you have the full unstable tree enabled? On Nov 29, 2003, at 10:08 PM, Paul INDELICATO wrote: Well root3 is

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Well root3 is installed: fink list root3 Information about 1925 packages read in 2 seconds. i root3 3.10.01-11Object-oriented data analysis framework i root3-shlibs3.10.01-11Object-oriented data analysis framework root3-threaded 3.05.

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi Paul, Great you solved your first problem, though I have no idea what really went wrong. Concerning roofitcore: you are definitely missing the root3 install. What gives 'fink list root3'? I guess that somehow your package database thinks, that root3 is installed, but it isn't (anymore).

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Finally I ran once more sudo find /sw/ -user 2011 -exec chown root:admin {} \; and did AGAIN a selfupdate and now I can compile pine-ssl 4.58. From the web page I thought that this problem happened only on 10.3, and I had run the command at some point already. Go figure! The roofitcore problem

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, actually my package description does not update correctly: I had indeed an old patch, but the only way I could get the right one was getting it "by hand" from the web site. When I do a rsynk update I get very often errors: Updating stable/main rsync -az --delete-after -v 'rsync://master.us

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Paul INDELICATO wrote: Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some f

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Remi Mommsen wrote: Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some feedback about those packages. Do you have any problems using them? Would yo

[Fink-users] Feedback request for cernlib and root3

Hi, The packages sci/cernlib and sci/root3 (version 3.10/01) are in the unstable trees since quite some time. I'd like to move them to the stable trees. Therefore I would be interested to hear some feedback about those packages. Do you have any problems using them? Would you please indicate th

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 06:08 PM, Olaf Foellinger wrote: > fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. > The > candidates: > > (1) giflib-bin: GIF image format handling library, LZW-enabled version > (2) libungif-bin: GIF image format handling library, LZW-fr

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

Hi, * Matt Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.08.02 08:30]wrote: > I'm after some feedback on the following packages: > > freeciv-1.13.0-1 freeciv gives the following error: $ sudo fink install freeciv Information about 1316 packages read in 0 seconds. pkg freeciv version ### pkg freeciv v

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 06:39 PM, Matt Stephenson wrote: > aalib-1.4rc5-1 > qtella-0.5.3-1 I know these work. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback Request

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 06:39 , Matt Stephenson wrote: > I'm after some feedback on the following packages: > diffutils-2.8.1-1 AFAICT, this is working fine. HTH, Dan -- This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery. -

[Fink-users] Feedback Request

I'm after some feedback on the following packages: aalib-1.4rc5-1 aftp-1.0-1 asp2php-0.76.13-1 calcoo-1.3.12-1 diffutils-2.8.1-1 freeciv-1.13.0-1 gnuboy-1.0.3-1 gnut-0.4.28-2 hfsutils-3.2.6-1 jags-0.20.2-1 joe-2.9.8-pre1-1 mtools-3.9.8-3 mtoolsfm-1.9-3-1 mutella-0.4.1-1 peacock-0.5-2 pong-1.0.2-2

[Fink-users] feedback request

I am looking for feedback on the following packages scribus 0.7.7-1 Layout program and lcms 1.09-1 Free color management engine in 100K siag 3.5.2-1 Ulric Eriksson's Office Suite and mowitz 0.2.0-2 Library of widgets for X applicati

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

At 11:41 AM -0400 7/24/02, Alexander Strange wrote: >Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > >gimp-1.2.3-9 >gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 >gimp-perl-1.211-2 >xscorch-0.1.15-1 >tads-2.5.5-3 > gimp you said you were moving to stable...good don't do perl don't do tads xscorch compil

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > >> Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: >> >> gimp-1.2.3-9 >> gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 >> gimp-perl-1.211-2 >> xscorch-0.1.15-1 >> ta

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > > gimp-1.2.3-9 I just updated to the above; the process went without a hitch. gimp was able to start, load pics,

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

On Wednesday, July 24, 2002, at 11:41 , Alexander Strange wrote: > Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: > > gimp-1.2.3-9 > gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 > gimp-perl-1.211-2 > xscorch-0.1.15-1 > tads-2.5.5-3 gimp-1.2.3-9 compiled fine (takes a while, though ), I've looked at s

[Fink-users] Feedback request

Could someone using unstable give me feedback on these packages: gimp-1.2.3-9 gtk-perl-pm-0.7008-5 gimp-perl-1.211-2 xscorch-0.1.15-1 tads-2.5.5-3 -- Alexander Strange iThink Software -- http://www.ithinksw.com --- This sf.net email is spons

Re: [Fink-users] Feedback request

I, too, have been lax when it comes to reporting stable software in the unstable tree. I also have unstable added to my configuration. I'll just say what I did if anyone wants to try this way, too. It was a bit faster than going through the website, that's for sure. It probably has missed a