On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Yup, gnome-session was doing bad things. Update to gnome-session
> 2.24.3-3 and it should work again.
It is working again, and my Gramps database is up and running.
Thanks for the quick fix!
Stan
--
Your fix to gnome-session worked. Good job and thank you.
On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
>> Stan Sanderson wrote:
>>
>>> I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday.
>>
>> I'm doing some diggin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Stan Sanderson wrote:
>
>> I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday.
>
> I'm doing some digging, and it looks like, in fact, gnome-session does
> some things it shouldn't regarding assuming the way dbus is implemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stan Sanderson wrote:
> I had a working Gnome install, just updated yesterday.
I'm doing some digging, and it looks like, in fact, gnome-session does
some things it shouldn't regarding assuming the way dbus is implemented
(which was true, for the lin
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support
> instead of using X11's session tracking.
>
> I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to
> confirm
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support
> instead of using X11's session tracking.
>
> I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to
> confirm
Gnome will no longer start. Here is the startup messages:
Macintosh-3:lib rmiles$ gnome &
[1] 11728
Macintosh-3:lib rmiles$ X11.app: main(): argc=1
argv[0] = ./X11.bin
Waiting for startup parameters via Mach IPC.
X11.app: Could not connect to server (DISPLAY is not set). Starting X
serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've committed an update to dbus that includes the new launchd support
instead of using X11's session tracking.
I'd love some feedback from folks, especially GNOME users, to confirm it
doesn't cause any issues for them. I tested it with a few apps th
I have several packages in unstable, that I'd like to get moved to
stable before the upcoming binary release.
findbugs-0.7.1-1
jdepend-2.6-2
jing-20030619-2
nxml-mode-20031018-1
python-mode-4.35-11
trang-20030619-1
If you're using any of these with no problems, can you send me a quick
D. E. Kiefer wrote:
It conflicts with Eudora 6. The cursor hangs while Eudora checks mail.
It's usable if you limit the checkmail time to 1 hour. I'm running the
latest KDE with xfree86 4.3.0.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What conflicts with Eudora?
XDarwin is just an application li
4.3.0-16 seems to be OK for me--I didn't notice any odd behavior,
anyway.
On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
The XFree86 4.3.0-16 package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and 4.3.99.16
package both contain important bugfixes that need to be released. If
you've had success
The XFree86 4.3.0-16 package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree and 4.3.99.16
package both contain important bugfixes that need to be released. If
you've had success (or failure) with either of these, could you please
let me know or post to the list? I'd like to fasttrack them to stable
if possible.
--
>> python-mode 4.35-1 Emacs - python edit mode
Jason> I'd like to test out python-mode.
Note that as of earlier today, the current version is 4.40. (4.38 is
available from Python CVS or the latest - 2.3.2 - release.) A release
separate from Python hasn't yet bee
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:31 PM, Jason Clark wrote:
On Nov 6, 2003, at 7:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable.
So can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some
feedback.
eieio 0.17-
On Nov 6, 2003, at 7:16 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So
can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some
feedback.
eieio 0.17-1 Enhanced
Integration of Emacs Interpreted
yd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:16:21 +1100
Subject: [Fink-users] Feedback wanted
I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So
can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some
feedback.
eieio 0.17
I've got quite a few packages that I'd like to get moved to stable. So
can anyone successfully using any of the following, give me some
feedback.
eieio 0.17-1 Enhanced
Integration of Emacs Interpreted Objects
elib 1.0-1
17 matches
Mail list logo
