Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

I was excited, an update to mono-tools. I thought I'd get monodoc working! Alas, I'm still fumbling with it... $ monodoc node `monohb' is not defined on the documentation map dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ Referenced from: /sw/lib/libgtkhtml-3.1.11.dylib Expected in:

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Garrett Cooper wrote: [] This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not only did all of the mono stuff compile and install Including mono-tools? correctly this time around (devoid

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: + export DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1/sw/lib:/usr/lib + DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1/sw/lib:/usr/lib + make install DESTDIR=/sw/src/fink.build/root-mono-tools-1.0-1 Making install in po

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c aha! I've got fileutils installed, that was the difference. checked in the fix, should be on the mirrors shortly --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

I installed fileutils and tried. Still no go with monodoc. $ fink install fileutils mono-tools [...] Setting up mono-tools (1.0-1) ... $ monodoc The monodoc GUI component is not installed. Install it from the mono-tools package. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks. On 8/19/05,

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: $ fink install fileutils mono-tools [...] Setting up mono-tools (1.0-1) ... $ monodoc The monodoc GUI component is not installed. Install it from the mono-tools package. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks. Ah, no, this is a different issue. I'd disabled the

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: [] This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not only did all of the mono stuff compile and

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

Garrett Cooper wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: [] Including mono-tools? Will try in a minute. Actually, Ben R updated it in the meantime, so it will now probably compile. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc issues

On Aug 19, 2005, at 9:55 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Aug 19, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: This may not be good news for all you guys that tweaked your fink installations already, but I just reinstalled fink and redid everything from scratch and not

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

I installed the newest mono and monodoc per Benjamin's suggestion. It requires mono-tools for monodoc to work, so I went to install it. Making all in common make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. /bin/rm -rf

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: I installed the newest mono and monodoc per Benjamin's suggestion. It requires mono-tools for monodoc to work, so I went to install it. It does? In what way? --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: Monodoc fails to run for me. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to start with this? There was something about using gnome-vfs2-ssl and monodevelop, but I'm not using gnome-vfs2 ssl packages. Thanks. $ monodoc dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Travis Smith wrote: Monodoc fails to run for me. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to start with this? There was something about using gnome-vfs2-ssl and monodevelop, but I'm not using gnome-vfs2 ssl packages. Thanks. could you try updating to mono 1.1.8.3/monodoc 1.0.7 and let me know

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Benjamin Reed wrote: Travis Smith wrote: I installed the newest mono and monodoc per Benjamin's suggestion. It requires mono-tools for monodoc to work, so I went to install it. It does? In what way? Maybe not, but mono-tools breaks for me in the same way as for Travis. Somehow Makefile

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:Benjamin Reed wrote: Travis Smith wrote: I installed the newest mono and monodoc per Benjamin's suggestion. Itrequires mono-tools for monodoc to work, so I went to install it. It does?  In what way? Maybe not, but mono-tools breaks for me in the

[Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

Monodoc fails to run for me. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to start with this? There was something about using gnome-vfs2-ssl and monodevelop, but I'm not using gnome-vfs2 ssl packages. Thanks. $ monodoc dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ Referenced from:

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

On Aug 17, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Travis Smith wrote: Monodoc fails to run for me. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to start with this? There was something about using gnome-vfs2-ssl and monodevelop, but I'm not using gnome-vfs2 ssl packages. Thanks. $ monodoc dyld: lazy symbol binding

Re: [Fink-users] Monodoc Issues

The environment is already set property. Though I went ahead and tried, since maybe there's a bug I don't know about. It didn't do anything differently. $ env | grep DYLD DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=: $ env DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH=: monodoc dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: