There seems to be a considerable time lag on my email from here. This
is now working
Don
On 27 Mar 2005, at 17:09, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
On 27 Mar 2005, at 13:22, Martin Costabel wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
[]
Has this been solved. I thought I saw a message from Martin saying
it had, b
Has gnome-python-py23 been upgraded because I still have
problems getting it to compile.
Don
**
Professor Don McKenzie Paul
Department of Physics
University of Warwick
COVENTRY CV4 7AL
UK
tel : (1203) 523603 fax (1203) 692016
email: [EMAIL P
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
[]
Are you sure you have the new version? Run
fink dumpinfo gnome-python2-py23 | grep gobject
and see if it returns anything.
-- Martin
The above returns nothing. Is that good or bad?
It is bad. The good versions reply
(export CPPFLAGS='-I/sw/include'; export LDFLAGS=
On 27 Mar 2005, at 13:22, Martin Costabel wrote:
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
[]
Has this been solved. I thought I saw a message from Martin saying it
had, but I still have the same problem after a recent update.
Are you sure you have the new version? Run
fink dumpinfo gnome-python2-py23 | grep go
Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
[]
Has this been solved. I thought I saw a message from Martin saying it
had, but I still have the same problem after a recent update.
Are you sure you have the new version? Run
fink dumpinfo gnome-python2-py23 | grep gobject
and see if it returns anything.
--
Martin
-
On 25 Mar 2005, at 06:42, Flatman wrote:
Same thing here,
even with gnome-python2-py23-2.0.0-16
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:28:36 +0100, Nicholas Cole wrote:
I'm having a problem installing pybliographic, which only exists in
the unstable tree, as far as I can see. So I've added the unstable
tree to my
Jeremy, no expert here, but I think 'fink show-deps foo' is what you
want; as in:
fink show-deps gnome-python2-py23
or
fink show-deps pygtk-py23
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Just out of interest... what's the best way to find the runtime and
build dependencies for a library? I think I've now got most of
Just out of interest... what's the best way to find the runtime and
build dependencies for a library? I think I've now got most of them for
pygtk 2.4.1, but just want to be sure...
Thanks!
On 26 Mar 2005, at 7:19, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 6:43 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Oops...
So we are... I was looking at the wrong files. Oops.
On 26 Mar 2005, at 7:19, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 6:43 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Oops... My bad. Make that GNOME 2.4.
Actually, we're up to gnome 2.6 in fink now. (Just went to stable
yesterday).
-- Dave
PGP.sig
Descript
On Mar 25, 2005, at 6:43 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Oops... My bad. Make that GNOME 2.4.
Actually, we're up to gnome 2.6 in fink now. (Just went to stable
yesterday).
-- Dave
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & ca
Just looking at the packages... the pygtk2 package needs updating as
well (to the 2.4 series), and you're listed as the maintainer.
Did you want me to update this package as well? To be honest, I don't
have that much time to work on the packages (if Fink, at all)... but I
can (try to) update th
Oops... My bad. Make that GNOME 2.4.
On 25 Mar 2005, at 22:30, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Ah, I see.
Well... Since gnome 2.6 is the latest version in Fink, I'll update the
gnome-python2 package to support that.
Haven't had a lot of time recently, but I do now, so I'll hop onto it.
;)
On 25 Mar 2005, a
Ah, I see.
Well... Since gnome 2.6 is the latest version in Fink, I'll update the
gnome-python2 package to support that.
Haven't had a lot of time recently, but I do now, so I'll hop onto it.
;)
On 25 Mar 2005, at 18:55, Daniel Macks wrote:
Without addressing this specific error, I'd note that
Daniel Macks wrote:
Without addressing this specific error, I'd note that 2.0.0 is a year
and a half old...the 2.0 series went to 2.0.3. But if gnome-python
numbering tracks that of GNOME itself, there a 2.6.2 (there's also a
2.10 series, but I don't know if it requres GNOME-2.10).
There are also m
Without addressing this specific error, I'd note that 2.0.0 is a year
and a half old...the 2.0 series went to 2.0.3. But if gnome-python
numbering tracks that of GNOME itself, there a 2.6.2 (there's also a
2.10 series, but I don't know if it requres GNOME-2.10).
There are also many missing BuildDe
Same thing here,
even with gnome-python2-py23-2.0.0-16
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:28:36 +0100, Nicholas Cole wrote:
> I'm having a problem installing pybliographic, which only exists in
> the unstable tree, as far as I can see. So I've added the unstable
> tree to my fink config. 250 odd packages
Exactly the same here :-(
If you find the solution ...
Erik
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:40:36 -0500, Sébastien Maret wrote:
> Here what I get. Help anyone ?
> Thanks in advance.
> Sébastien
> ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _locale_charset
> /sw/lib/libiconv.dylib(localcharset.o) definit
17 matches
Mail list logo
