Justin Hallett,
I think you hit on a real key point. Disclaimer: I've been traveling
and haven't looked at the Apple X11 Public Beta license, but if its not
at least LGPL'ed, then why is everyone getting so excited about it?
APSL is not GPL. I thought that the Fink community was and is for true
On Wednesday, Jan 8, 2003, at 17:25 US/Eastern, Justin Hallett wrote:
I don't think they will be able to charge for it, maybe if they make an
extra lib that isn;t GPL/LGPL'd but if and I repeat if they make a
superior one I may concider paying for it, not for the crap they just
put
out though, a
I wasn't aware of both of these facts, thanks RangerRick.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The can charge for it if they want... First, X's license is not
>GPL/LGPL, it's essentially a BSD-ish license. Second, "open source"
>only covers distribution, not charging. So it's perfectly legal to
>charg
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 05:25 PM, Justin Hallett wrote:
I don't think they will be able to charge for it, maybe if they make an
extra lib that isn;t GPL/LGPL'd but if and I repeat if they make a
superior one I may concider paying for it, not for the crap they just
put
out though, alth
I don't think they will be able to charge for it, maybe if they make an
extra lib that isn;t GPL/LGPL'd but if and I repeat if they make a
superior one I may concider paying for it, not for the crap they just put
out though, although i know it's a beta and has lots of good in it, so I'm
waitting fo
I think apple should be rewarded for making a superior X11 (if it comes
to that). I'd certainly pay for a better x11.
-sagar
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 12:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Folks:
I am worried that once we get addicted, Apple will charge for the new
X11. Does anyo
Hi Folks:
I am worried that once we get addicted, Apple will charge for the new
X11. Does anyone know whether this will happen and if so how it might
be prevented? The term "public beta" fuels my paranoia.
Bill
---
This SF.NET email is sp
