RE: [Fink-users] fink and 10.1.5

Institute. > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 October 2002 15:35 > To: Warren Pollans > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] fink and 10.1.5 > > > My understanding is that 10.1.5 users will be able to use > fin

Re: [Fink-users] fink and 10.1.5

My understanding is that 10.1.5 users will be able to use fink the same way as they always did, but that the package list will be frozen: new packages won't be added, including new versions of existing packages. Also, I don't know if the .info files will be updated for URL changes or not. The s

Re: [Fink-users] fink and 10.1.5

According to the webpage: 2002-09-28: Fink 0.4.1 released- The source release and the binary installer are available now, as well as all binary packages. For information about upgrading, visit the Upgrade Matrix. This is the last release for Mac OS X 10.1. Future versions of Fink will not offi

[Fink-users] fink and 10.1.5

Is 10.1.5 "supported" in fink, or is there pressure to move to 10.2. I realise that the developers/maintainers are doing a sterling job for no reward and have to devote their resources and skills to what fits their needs best. I also acknowledge that 10.2 is "the future", at least for the prese

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

I stand corrected. Good to know that Fink has access to pre-releases from Apple so not to be taken by surprise when official release comes out. At 12:49 PM +0200 6/6/02, Max Horn wrote: >At 10:17 Uhr +0200 06.06.2002, Massimo Marino wrote: >>For weeks? >> >>10.1.5 came out two days ago :-))

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

At 10:17 Uhr +0200 06.06.2002, Massimo Marino wrote: >For weeks? > >10.1.5 came out two days ago :-)) Yes but beta testers where using it for weeks. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-49489

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

For weeks? 10.1.5 came out two days ago :-)) Anyway, no problems yet to report on my installation. At 1:08 PM -0400 6/5/02, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: >I have been using it for weeks with no apparent side affects. it is >mainly bugfixes and drivers, no low-level changes > >On Wednesday, June 5

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

Chris Zubrzycki writes: > I have been using it for weeks with no apparent side > affects. it is mainly bugfixes and drivers, no low-level > changes It does install a newer version of sendmail, but not well enough to avoid causing problems. If you use postfix, or sendmail, then you'll probably

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > I have been using it for weeks with no apparent side affects. it is > mainly bugfixes and drivers, no low-level changes You've been using 10.1.5 for weeks? The one that came out yesterday? :) I'm seeing lots of reports of bugs on various lists & sites. The [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 13:00, Michael C. Haller wrote: > Hi, > > has anyone made experiences with Fink and 10.1.5? > > Does Fink work with 10.1.5 or are there any problems? no problems here. -- Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://defiance.dyndns.org/ / http://radio.scenespot

Re: [Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

I have been using it for weeks with no apparent side affects. it is mainly bugfixes and drivers, no low-level changes On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Michael C. Haller wrote: Hi, has anyone made experiences with Fink and 10.1.5? Does Fink work with 10.1.5 or are there any problems? -c

[Fink-users] Fink and 10.1.5

Hi, has anyone made experiences with Fink and 10.1.5? Does Fink work with 10.1.5 or are there any problems? Michael ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.spr