On Feb 11, 2005, at 5:54 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
Thanks Dave. It didn't replace sqlite 2, so I guess can they co-exist?
You're welcome!
And yes, they can be installed at the same time (even the -dev
splitoffs, in fact). It's useful to be able to use databases made with
either version.
Dave
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:04 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
I already have a Fink package made for SQLite 3, I sent it to the
maintainer of SQLite 2 about a month ago and asked him if he wanted to
manage it. Since he hasn't responded, and there's a need for this
package, I'll commit it to CVS now.
Than
Thanks, sounds very good!
I also tried to contact that sqlite maintainer, but the mail response
was "account loops back to itself" or other such mysterious thing. So,
I recon, he's gone..
-ak
11.2.2005 kello 10:04, Dave Vasilevsky kirjoitti:
On Feb 9, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
Fink
On Feb 9, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
Fink is the last resort where SQLite3 has not surfaced, yet. Is there
a real reason for this (technical, otherwise?) or.. is it just not so
important?
SQLite3 is a more efficient, new version of SQLite. It is designed to
co-exist peacefully with
On Feb 9, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
Fink is the last resort where SQLite3 has not surfaced, yet. Is there
a real reason for this (technical, otherwise?) or.. is it just not so
important?
SQLite3 is a more efficient, new version of SQLite. It is designed to
co-exist peacefully with
Fink is the last resort where SQLite3 has not surfaced, yet. Is there
a real reason for this (technical, otherwise?) or.. is it just not so
important?
SQLite3 is a more efficient, new version of SQLite. It is designed to
co-exist peacefully with old SQLite, so I see no real reason why Fink
s
