Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-16 Thread Alwyn
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:26 am, Ben Hines wrote: Yes, it is still incomplete. Stuff like pthread_cancel() doesn't even work. I've just tested 'pthread_cancel', and you're quite right. I really expected this was going to be fixed in 10.2. Alwyn ---

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-15 Thread Alwyn
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:43 pm, Jeff Whitaker wrote: This could be a Matlab bug, or a bug in Apple's posix threads implementation (which is known to incomplete). I was under the impression that as of Darwin 6 (Mac OS X 10.2), Apple had made their pthreads implementation fully, or

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Justin Hallett
no this is the correct way.. the next is all one line.. sudo dpkg --force-all --remove system-xfree86; sudo rm -rf /etc/X11 /usr/X11R6 /Applications/XDarwin.app; fink install xfree86-rootless-threaded [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >system-xfree86 assumes that you have installed the standard, non-thr

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Justin Hallett
libxine, xine0ui, kxine I know do for sure and I'm sure more will come. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >If I understand correctly, lixine is one of a very small number of Fink >packages (perhaps the only one) which do *not* work with the standard -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communicati

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Alwyn
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:43 pm, Jeff Whitaker wrote: This could be a Matlab bug, or a bug in Apple's posix threads implementation (which is known to incomplete). I was under the impression that as of Darwin 6 (Mac OS X 10.2), Apple had made their pthreads implementation fully, or

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Phil Ershler
Jeff, Is there an issue with the threaded package and matlab? Am I right in assuming that the threaded package runs faster? Thanks, Phil On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 01:25 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Alywn: On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Alwyn wrote: I feared this was so. It is a depressing pro

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Jeff Whitaker
Alywn: On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Alwyn wrote: > > I feared this was so. It is a depressing prospect. > > Thanks for the clarification. The good news is, as long as you don't care about matlab, the xfree86-threaded package is perfectly stable (at least as far as I can tell - I've been running daily f

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Alwyn
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:15 pm, David R. Morrison wrote: If I understand correctly, lixine is one of a very small number of Fink packages (perhaps the only one) which do *not* work with the standard xfree86, but require a separately-compiled xfree86 with the "threaded" option. Unf

Re: [Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread David R. Morrison
If I understand correctly, lixine is one of a very small number of Fink packages (perhaps the only one) which do *not* work with the standard xfree86, but require a separately-compiled xfree86 with the "threaded" option. On the other hand, the "threaded" version of xfree86 breaks some other applic

[Fink-users] libxine and xfree86-base-threaded etc.

2002-11-14 Thread Alwyn
I am running Mac OS X 10.2.2 and have installed XFree86 4.2.1.1, using the installer provided by the nice people at XDarwin.org, which is represented in Fink by the dummy package, system-xfree86 4.2.1. As I mentioned in an earlier e-mail, 'selfupdate-cvs' followed by 'update-all' revealed that