Hi Rose,
I was trying to debug this and it seems like there is an inconsistency
between the left hand boundary and the analytical solution.
By my calculations A~1 and B~0, that makes the gradient of the line about
1, yet the left hand boundary condition expects a gradient of about 0.0666
(if C
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your response. The left side boundary condition is the first
boundary condition shown below. So, what I did is to express dC/dz at z=0
as beta*(C-Cw)/D to set the constraint for the gradient on the left side. I
learned this from one of the examples (Convection.Robin) in the
What Daniel is saying is to set the FiPy solution aside for the moment. Your
analytical solution does not appear to be consistent with your boundary
condition:
A = beta*(Cl-Cw)/(D+beta*L)
\approx 1
B = Cl-A*L
\approx 0
Canal = A*zc+B
\approx zc
(\partial Canal /
Hi Daniel and Jonathan,
I used Matlab's pdepe function and got numerical solution that is close to
my analytical solution. I've attached the code for your information.
Best regards,
Rose
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:10 PM, yuan wang rose.w...@tufts.edu wrote:
Hi Daniel and Jonathan,
I double
