On 16-11-2011 22:39, Frank Ingermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm trying to combine the new Window functions in Fb3 with
> recursive CTEs to get a _defined_ ordering of the recursive
> child records in the result set.
>
The "recursive" problem is fixed, in fact it was a problem of window
functions w
Hi Claudio,
>> From: Frank Ingermann [mailto:fr...@fingerman.de]
>>
>> Still i think it's a no-go to just take the ability _away_ to
>> clear out those sources. It IS common practise.
(+1 for the COMMENTs!)
> The problem is that we lack equivalent commands for sources and debugging.
> Then if w
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Ingermann [mailto:fr...@fingerman.de]
> Sent: Miércoles, 30 de Noviembre de 2011 19:32
>
> Still i think it's a no-go to just take the ability _away_ to
> clear out those sources. It IS common practise.
I don't see any reason to forbid it either. Let's
Hi Helen e.a.,
Am 30.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Helen Borrie:
>>>On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
or
CHANGE OWNER OF [|*] TO
>> I don't think bloat the language with non-standard syntax for
>> non-mainstream tasks is a good thing.
@Adriano: i don't li
user without any rights can delete sequences, collations and even triggers with
rdb$system_flag=0
-
Key: CORE-3681
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3681
> I may be wrong, but I'm unable to find a way how a trace plugin can call
> engine to get
> more information that is sent via parameters.
> Particularly I'm interested in getting BLOB/array content from
> trace_dsql_execute()
> handler.
> Is it possible to expand TraceConnection class to
AdSF> If anyone write it and distribute it, it's easy for anyone. And it's not
AdSF> difficult to write it.
Maybe it is not difficult for core developers, but I don't think any of
you will spend time with such thing, uh?
>> Things will get better when crypto plugins and local users becomes a
>> r
At 10:50 PM 30/11/2011, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>On 30/11/2011 03:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
>>> DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
>>> or
>>> CHANGE OWNER OF [|*] TO
>> This approach looks much better than use of system package.
>>
>>
>I don't think bloat
On 30/11/2011 16:05, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
> AdSF> With BLR + debug_info it's very possible (and easy) to reconstruct
> AdSF> sources. And better, you don't even need to read the sources in the
> AdSF> original format style, but in the style you you want it!
>
> Probably not,
So as I suppose.
AdSF> With BLR + debug_info it's very possible (and easy) to reconstruct
AdSF> sources. And better, you don't even need to read the sources in the
AdSF> original format style, but in the style you you want it!
Probably not, but what you call "easy" probably is not true for 99% of
the standard FB
On 30/11/2011 14:52, Björn Reimer wrote:
> The discussion about removing sources or not makes little sense for
> me. It is possible with fb 2.5 and prior and should be possible in
> future versions as this feature is used. If you don't like it don't
> use it.
I wonder if these people who is re
EXECUTE BLOCK statement and ISC_DSQL_EXECUTE2() problem.
Key: CORE-3680
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3680
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components
> 30.11.2011 12:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>> Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
>> ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>> ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
> +1, although I'd prefer SET instead of CHANGE. And I believe that CREATE
> OR ALTER should miss this clause.
+1 That sounds very f
30.11.2011 12:27, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
> AP>DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
>
> +1
May I suggest to borrow a term from Oracle and add clause "WRAPPED" to
"CREATE" or "ALTER"?
I.e "create wrapped procedure as ..." or "create procedure aaa wrapped
as ...".
It would make migration a bit easier
internal gds software consistency check (limbo impossible (184), file: vio.cpp
line: 2036)
--
Key: CORE-3679
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3679
30.11.2011 12:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> BLR remains.
Weren't you going to get rid of it someday?..
> Btw, I also do not like practice of dropping the sources. People use it
> as a kind of protection for the database. This protection is not efficient.
> But if users need that feature I can bet
DS>I agree with changing owner, but dropping the sources is a way to
nowhere. Firebird
DS> requires sources to recompile invalid objects.
Hiding procedure and triggers source is an approach widely used in
Brazil, as a way to "minimize" the chances of their logic being stolen
by anyone (I gues
Allow DefaultDbCachePages more than 131072 pages.
-
Key: CORE-3678
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3678
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Engi
On 11/30/11 13:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 30/11/2011 03:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
>>> DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
>>> or
>>> CHANGE OWNER OF [|*] TO
>> This approach looks much better than use of system package.
>>
>>
> I don't think bloat t
On 11/30/11 14:39, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 30.11.2011 9:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>> Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
>>
>> ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>> ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>>
>> etc..
>>
>> ALTER PROCEDURE ... DROP SOURCE;
>>
>>
>> I have no idea if the SQL stan
30.11.2011 9:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
>
> ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
> ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
>
> etc..
>
> ALTER PROCEDURE ... DROP SOURCE;
>
>
> I have no idea if the SQL standard suggests here something.
I agree with changing own
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Pawel Sawicki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are running Firebird-2.5.1 on virtual machine with RHEL6.0. Our
> hypervisor is KVM. From time to time we get Firebird unresponsive and we
> need to restart it. This situation occurs on heavy loaded system, strace
> shows tha
On 30/11/2011 03:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
>> DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
>> or
>> CHANGE OWNER OF [|*] TO
> This approach looks much better than use of system package.
>
>
I don't think bloat the language with non-standard syntax for
non-mainstream tasks is a
30.11.2011 12:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
> Who knows which evil is lesser...
> If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
> even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
But at least it will work fine for him, even being possibly a bit slower
than the x64 build. And those wh
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 12:44:50 PM, you wrote:
AP> Who knows which evil is lesser...
AP> If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
AP> even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
I think this is design flaw of sf.net, and that's it.
Personally, I'd pl
On 11/30/11 12:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
> Unfortunately, not.
>
>> On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
>> I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
> This is the lesse
30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
Unfortunately, not.
> On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
> I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
This is the lesser evil. You know that 32-bit builds can work in bot
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:44:57 +0400, Dmitry Yemanov
wrote:
> 30.11.2011 11:37, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>> So the reason is elsewhere.
>
> Found it. SF has an ability to set the default download for the every
> major platform (Win/Lin/Mac/etc). This option was left empty for the
> server binarie
30.11.2011 12:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
>
> ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
> ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
+1, although I'd prefer SET instead of CHANGE. And I believe that CREATE
OR ALTER should miss this clause.
Dmitry
-
> On 11/30/11 02:42, Frank Ingermann wrote:
>> DROP SOURCE OF [||*]
>> or
>> CHANGE OWNER OF [|*] TO
>
> This approach looks much better than use of system package.
Or more "object type bound", e.g.:
ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
etc..
ALTER PROCEDURE
Frank wrote:
> Using the API is one thing, but imho it should be possible to do all of
that
> from within a SQL script - like
>
> DROP SOURCE OF [||*] or CHANGE
> OWNER OF [|*] TO
I like this.
What about ?
Magnus
--
31 matches
Mail list logo
