[Firebird-devel] Project Tracker and secondary web server are back online

2013-03-20 Thread Leyne, Sean
All, Very early this morning (2am EDT), the storage cluster which is used to host these VMs suffered a critical iSCSI network failure of the storage (due to a compatibility issue with IPv6). This failure resulted in a loss of connectivity to the storage and thus a shutdown of the hosts. The s

Re: [Firebird-devel] API data types

2013-03-20 Thread Ann Harrison
Dmitry, > 1) If we ever face a platform with sizeof(int) == 8 (IA64? anything > else?) would it be OK that our API becomes platform-specific in regard > to its ABI? Or was it exactly the goal? IIRC, we had discussed using > types from stdint.h instead, but I don't remember any decision. > When t

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Dmitry Kovalenko
Hi again Stack of crash: > engine12.dll!EXE_unwind(Jrd::thread_db * tdbb=0x0145f8e8, Jrd::jrd_req * request=0x) Строка 939 + 0x3 байт C++ engine12.dll!JRD_start(Jrd::thread_db * tdbb=0x0145f8e8, Jrd::jrd_req * request=0x, Jrd::jrd_tra * transaction=0x452502c8) Строка 7188 + 0xd

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Dmitry Kovalenko
Uge ... sorry - yes, of course :) Kovalenko Dmitry 2013/3/20 Vlad Khorsun > > I think, crash can reproduced without any problem ... > > Could you test just committed patch for it ? > > Thanks, > Vlad > > > -- > Eve

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Vlad Khorsun
> I think, crash can reproduced without any problem ... Could you test just committed patch for it ? Thanks, Vlad -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDyna

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Vlad Khorsun
>> But in v2.5 there was correct code, so bug was introduced in trunk only. >> >> So far i'm failed to see revision before 51654, i.e. before srvr_w32.cpp >> was moved >> from src/remote/os/win32 to the src/remote/server/os/win32... > > It seems to be introduced after the move, by SVN revis

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:51:31PM +0200, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > But in v2.5 there was correct code, so bug was introduced in trunk only. > > So far i'm failed to see revision before 51654, i.e. before srvr_w32.cpp > was moved > from src/remote/os/win32 to the src/remote/server/os/win32...

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Vlad Khorsun
> So the solution is either to check return value for NULL in > xnet_connect_wait_thread() (as inet_connect_wait_thread() does) or throw > exception instead of returning NULL, either in XNET_connect() or as deep > as in connect_server() (in src/remote/os/win32/xnet.cpp). I'm not > familiar with the

Re: [Firebird-devel] security3.fdb unavailable database

2013-03-20 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/20/13 13:33, Treeve Jelbert wrote: > On Tuesday 19 March 2013 11:23:43 Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 03/19/13 10:41, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote: >>> File: src\common\config\config.cpp >>> Line: 173 >>> >>> Correct: >>> {TYPE_STRING, "SecurityDatabase", (ConfigValue) "$(root)security3.fdb"}, >>> // >

Re: [Firebird-devel] security3.fdb unavailable database

2013-03-20 Thread Treeve Jelbert
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 11:23:43 Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 03/19/13 10:41, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote: > > File: src\common\config\config.cpp > > Line: 173 > > > > Correct: > > {TYPE_STRING, "SecurityDatabase", (ConfigValue) "$(root)security3.fdb"}, > > // > > security database name > > Yes, it's be

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB3 crash

2013-03-20 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:36:43AM +0400, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote: > - [fresh crash] > > firebird.exe!set_server(rem_port * port=0x, unsigned short flags=56) >  Строка 5455 + 0x6 байт C++ >   firebird.exe!SRVR_main(rem_port * main_port=0x, unsigned short > flags=

Re: [Firebird-devel] Codebase degradation

2013-03-20 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/18/13 17:38, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 18/03/2013 10:19, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> IMessageMetadata is refcounted interface. I.e. it's lifetime is not >> restricted to statement, attachment, something else. As long as needed >> user keeps counter > 0, and strings returned by getF

Re: [Firebird-devel] Codebase degradation

2013-03-20 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/18/13 21:11, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 18/03/2013 13:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 03/18/13 17:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>> MyStatusImpl status;// inline >>> apiFunction(&status); // status methods are called only if a error is >>> throw >>> status.check()